From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/408
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: =?UTF-8?B?THVrYSBNYXLEjWV0acSH?= <paxcoder@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: cluts daily reports 8/12 - continuing pthread_eintr, still
 stuck with alloc
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 17:48:27 +0200
Message-ID: <4E454B4B.1030906@gmail.com>
References: <4E4493E6.6050809@gmail.com> <20110812024725.GG132@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20110812031330.GA4908@openwall.com>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1313164259 9355 80.91.229.12 (12 Aug 2011 15:50:59 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 15:50:59 +0000 (UTC)
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-409-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Fri Aug 12 17:50:56 2011
Return-path: <musl-return-409-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@lo.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by lo.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-409-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1Qru0d-0002t9-8T
	for gllmg-musl@lo.gmane.org; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 17:50:55 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 15868 invoked by uid 550); 12 Aug 2011 15:50:54 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 15860 invoked from network); 12 Aug 2011 15:50:54 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=P6YELCaoa0xYeZtBLhYVqQpUcNmApbKkrpcCvE3UVyM=;
        b=cSFBqpW0EBeuLQHRfBDHa2GPtYpRzXhYBDKT2bcu6wyZ4oO5IydHJkCk5lwf/OBCaX
         IwKoJPi/5KwW+sMWYam49IpsSsQ5Qa1FMgKlqftEU7TPA4y3mkv4IrcQeYBx1abNLspN
         +9KLmK/Nd6Q5XHd1sJUcFD7TeVqOmTkbSuTnc=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110626 Icedove/3.1.11
In-Reply-To: <20110812031330.GA4908@openwall.com>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:408
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/408>

On 08/12/2011 05:13 AM, Solar Designer wrote:
> Rather than disable the warning, Luka can do:
>
> 	(void) foo;
>
> which is portable, unlike "++foo", and it silences the gcc warning too

is this situation is why casting to void is allowed? I notice there's no 
"statement with no effect" warning.
I wasn't aware of this, so thanks.
Luka