From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/786 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Georgi Chorbadzhiyski Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: Current status vs 1.0 wishlist, 0.9 Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 12:49:38 +0300 Organization: Unix Solutions Ltd. (http://unixsol.org) Message-ID: <4FA10332.603@unixsol.org> References: <20120424003111.GN14673@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1335952194 7850 80.91.229.3 (2 May 2012 09:49:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 09:49:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Rich Felker To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-787-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Wed May 02 11:49:52 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SPWC0-0003F2-L2 for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 02 May 2012 11:49:52 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 26067 invoked by uid 550); 2 May 2012 09:49:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 26059 invoked from network); 2 May 2012 09:49:50 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120314 Thunderbird/11.0 In-Reply-To: <20120424003111.GN14673@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:786 Archived-At: Around 04/24/2012 03:31 AM, Rich Felker scribbled: > I was just looking back at the wishlist for 1.0 dated a little over a > year ago, and noticing that all but 3 items on it are completed. (The > incomplete ones are static-linked dlopen support, limited ability to > load/run glibc-linked apps/libs, and documentation.) > > As for 0.9, there was never a formal wishlist, but I've covered all > the intended areas mentioned as short-term goals in the past few > release announcements. I think musl could use some more testing > scrutiny before the big release (we don't want it to be like gcc > 4.7... :), so I'm going to hold off a bit; please continue to report > bugs and app compatibility issues so we can get as much working as > possible, with as few bugs as possible, for 0.9. Hi, there were talks about re-licensing musl to BSD like license, what happened to that? -- Georgi Chorbadzhiyski http://georgi.unixsol.org/