From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/787 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Georgi Chorbadzhiyski Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: Current status vs 1.0 wishlist, 0.9 Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 12:54:20 +0300 Organization: Unix Solutions Ltd. (http://unixsol.org) Message-ID: <4FA1044C.90406@unixsol.org> References: <20120424003111.GN14673@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <4FA10332.603@unixsol.org> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1335952476 10366 80.91.229.3 (2 May 2012 09:54:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 09:54:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Rich Felker To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-788-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Wed May 02 11:54:36 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SPWGW-0005gR-NS for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 02 May 2012 11:54:32 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 29787 invoked by uid 550); 2 May 2012 09:54:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 29778 invoked from network); 2 May 2012 09:54:31 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120314 Thunderbird/11.0 In-Reply-To: <4FA10332.603@unixsol.org> Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:787 Archived-At: Around 05/02/2012 12:49 PM, Georgi Chorbadzhiyski scribbled: > Around 04/24/2012 03:31 AM, Rich Felker scribbled: >> I was just looking back at the wishlist for 1.0 dated a little over a >> year ago, and noticing that all but 3 items on it are completed. (The >> incomplete ones are static-linked dlopen support, limited ability to >> load/run glibc-linked apps/libs, and documentation.) >> >> As for 0.9, there was never a formal wishlist, but I've covered all >> the intended areas mentioned as short-term goals in the past few >> release announcements. I think musl could use some more testing >> scrutiny before the big release (we don't want it to be like gcc >> 4.7... :), so I'm going to hold off a bit; please continue to report >> bugs and app compatibility issues so we can get as much working as >> possible, with as few bugs as possible, for 0.9. > > Hi, there were talks about re-licensing musl to BSD like license, what > happened to that? Sorry for asking the second time, I was unable to find my first e-mail /it has gone to Junk folder because of failed SPF/. Again, sorry. -- Georgi Chorbadzhiyski http://georgi.unixsol.org/