From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/789 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Georgi Chorbadzhiyski Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: Current status vs 1.0 wishlist, 0.9 Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 14:51:03 +0300 Organization: Unix Solutions Ltd. (http://unixsol.org) Message-ID: <4FA11FA7.1030905@unixsol.org> References: <20120424003111.GN14673@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <4FA10332.603@unixsol.org> <4FA1044C.90406@unixsol.org> <20120502110807.GA16958@openwall.com> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1335959480 30871 80.91.229.3 (2 May 2012 11:51:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 11:51:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: musl@lists.openwall.com To: Solar Designer Original-X-From: musl-return-790-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Wed May 02 13:51:18 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SPY5U-0001sb-0m for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 02 May 2012 13:51:16 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 19751 invoked by uid 550); 2 May 2012 11:51:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 19742 invoked from network); 2 May 2012 11:51:15 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120314 Thunderbird/11.0 In-Reply-To: <20120502110807.GA16958@openwall.com> Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:789 Archived-At: Around 05/02/2012 02:08 PM, Solar Designer scribbled: > On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 12:54:20PM +0300, Georgi Chorbadzhiyski wrote: >> Sorry for asking the second time, I was unable to find my first e-mail /it >> has gone to Junk folder because of failed SPF/. Again, sorry. > > Why did it fail SPF? Is this anything with the list setup? > > I think we have the proper SPF record for lists.openwall.com: > > $ host -t txt lists.openwall.com > lists.openwall.com descriptive text "v=spf1 mx ip4:195.42.179.200 -all" > > Do you possibly use SPF along with mail forwarding from another address > of yours? (This is a fundamental problem of SPF.) Here are the headers that I received on the last email that I have sent to the ML: > Received: from mother.openwall.net ([::ffff:195.42.179.200]) > by ns.unixsol.org with SMTP; Wed, 02 May 2012 12:54:32 +0300 > id 0000000000144123.4FA10458.00007834 > Received-SPF: none SPF=HELO; sender=mother.openwall.net; remoteip=::ffff:195.42.179.200; remotehost=; helo=mother.openwall.net; receiver=ns.unixsol.org; > Received-SPF: pass SPF=MAILFROM; sender=musl-return-788-gf=unixsol.org@lists.openwall.com; remoteip=::ffff:195.42.179.200; remotehost=; helo=mother.openwall.net; receiver=ns.unixsol.org; > Received: (qmail 29787 invoked by uid 550); 2 May 2012 09:54:32 -0000 > Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm > Precedence: bulk > List-Post: > List-Help: > List-Unsubscribe: > List-Subscribe: > Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com > Delivered-To: mailing list musl@lists.openwall.com > Received: (qmail 29778 invoked from network); 2 May 2012 09:54:31 -0000 > Message-ID: <4FA1044C.90406@unixsol.org> > Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 12:54:20 +0300 > From: Georgi Chorbadzhiyski > Organization: Unix Solutions Ltd. (http://unixsol.org) > User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120314 Thunderbird/11.0 > MIME-Version: 1.0 > To: musl@lists.openwall.com > CC: Rich Felker > References: <20120424003111.GN14673@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <4FA10332.603@unixsol.org> > In-Reply-To: <4FA10332.603@unixsol.org> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > Subject: Re: [musl] Current status vs 1.0 wishlist, 0.9 > Received-SPF: fail SPF=FROM; sender=gf@unixsol.org; remoteip=::ffff:195.42.179.200; remotehost=; helo=mother.openwall.net; receiver=ns.unixsol.org; The last line was the problem. Since openwall lists are sending the email as me as sender, my spf checks fail. I have checks for X-Mailing-Lists header but since ezmlm sets Mailing-List the checks fail. The problem is on my side. I have fixed it, sorry for the noise. -- Georgi Chorbadzhiyski http://georgi.unixsol.org/