From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/987 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Spencer Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: Hello Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 21:10:25 +0200 Message-ID: <4FD0FCA1.3030808@barfooze.de> References: <20120607200123.402a1672@sibserver.ru> <4FD0A902.6070108@barfooze.de> <20120607231831.66c78c33@sibserver.ru> <4FD0D6D9.5080707@barfooze.de> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1339095712 11753 80.91.229.3 (7 Jun 2012 19:01:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 19:01:52 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-988-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Thu Jun 07 21:01:52 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Schxq-00046o-0s for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2012 21:01:46 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 4009 invoked by uid 550); 7 Jun 2012 19:01:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 4001 invoked from network); 7 Jun 2012 19:01:45 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110221 SUSE/3.1.8 Mail/1.0 In-Reply-To: Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:987 Archived-At: On 06/07/2012 08:03 PM, Jens Staal wrote: > 2012/6/7 John Spencer: >> On 06/07/2012 05:18 PM, orc wrote: >> what kept me from configuring X11 to work properly is its huge freaking >> complexity. >> if an older version is simpler and can do the job as well, i'm all for it. >> i fear though that you won't get any up-to-date software compiled against >> it. >> probably not worth the effort. >> >> --JS > What about Tiny Core Linux's "tinyX", and perhaps one could even > compile that statically? I have no idea how compatible that is to > Xorg's X11 though... Another appealing alternative could be if there > is a small X11 layer to run on top of Wayland, if that would be easier > to build/configure. > that's what sabotage currently uses http://www.x-oz.com/Xfbdev.1.html "Xfbdev - Linux framebuffer device tiny X server"