From: John Spencer <maillist-musl@barfooze.de>
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Cc: Luca Barbato <lu_zero@gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] makefile: add silent rules
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 09:34:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FD8429C.6030707@barfooze.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1339564923-13703-2-git-send-email-lu_zero@gentoo.org>
On 06/13/2012 07:22 AM, Luca Barbato wrote:
> make V=1 to disable them
are you blind or just stubborn ?
you already got your NO last time.
On 06/07/2012 10:13 AM, Luca Barbato wrote:
> make V=1 to disable them
On 06/07/2012 03:12 PM, Igmar Palsenberg wrote:
>
>> make V=1 to disable them
> <snip>
>
> This was NACK'ed a month ago. I'm with the NACK crew, I hardly find this useful, and I like fast scrolling terminals :)
>
>
>
> Igmar
>
>
On 06/07/2012 03:18 PM, Rich Felker wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 03:12:48PM +0200, Igmar Palsenberg wrote:
>>
>>> make V=1 to disable them
>> <snip>
>>
>> This was NACK'ed a month ago. I'm with the NACK crew, I hardly find
>> this useful, and I like fast scrolling terminals :)
> I'm not as adamant on it, but I'm also in the group that doesn't like
> this "new style" of makefile output. Most annoyingly, when something
> goes wrong, you have to re-run make with V=1 to see what was actually
> happening. Oftentimes I find I want to rerun a command with -S instead
> of -c (to examine the generated asm) or with different CFLAGS when
> dealing with an unexpected ICE or similar.
On 06/07/2012 03:19 PM, John Spencer wrote:
> On 06/07/2012 10:13 AM, Luca Barbato wrote:
>> make V=1 to disable them
>> ---
>>
> please see the mail georgi sent to the list at 13th may and the
> followup responses.
>
> maybe 10% of users want a "quiet" build, so why force your preference
> on anybody ?
>
> if it was the other way around (explicitly enable the "quiet" stuff),
> i wouldn't be as opposed to this idea.
> but effectively it gains you nothing except "awesome looks" *sigh*,
> and adds additional bloat to the Makefile.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-13 7:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-13 5:22 Build system tweaks Luca Barbato
2012-06-13 5:22 ` [PATCH 1/3] makefile: add silent rules Luca Barbato
2012-06-13 6:27 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2012-06-13 7:46 ` Luca Barbato
2012-06-13 7:34 ` John Spencer [this message]
2012-06-13 7:45 ` Luca Barbato
2012-06-13 9:45 ` John Spencer
2012-06-13 5:22 ` [PATCH 2/3] cosmetic: remove trailing whitespace Luca Barbato
2012-06-13 5:22 ` [PATCH 3/3] makefile: split install target Luca Barbato
2012-08-16 16:18 [PATCH 1/3] makefile: add silent rules Luca Barbato
2012-08-16 16:51 ` orc
2012-08-16 17:05 ` Luca Barbato
2012-08-16 23:03 ` idunham
2012-08-16 23:06 ` Gregor Richards
2012-08-17 0:10 ` Luca Barbato
2012-08-17 1:21 ` Rich Felker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FD8429C.6030707@barfooze.de \
--to=maillist-musl@barfooze.de \
--cc=lu_zero@gentoo.org \
--cc=musl@lists.openwall.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.vuxu.org/mirror/musl/
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).