From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/342 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: musl path Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2011 23:00:33 +0200 Message-ID: <4c8e5da102149751df52f5d426e2ab36@smtp1.ispfr.net> References: <589f298577c7ae68a4e66f1b6f2ee488@smtp1.ispfr.net> <20110806162803.GX29562@port70.net> <20110806202736.GE132@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1312664451 26563 80.91.229.12 (6 Aug 2011 21:00:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2011 21:00:51 +0000 (UTC) To: Original-X-From: musl-return-343-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Sat Aug 06 23:00:46 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@lo.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by lo.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QpnzC-0005Gd-26 for gllmg-musl@lo.gmane.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2011 23:00:46 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 11921 invoked by uid 550); 6 Aug 2011 21:00:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 11913 invoked from network); 6 Aug 2011 21:00:45 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20110806202736.GE132@brightrain.aerifal.cx> X-Sender: nicolas@atelier-web.com User-Agent: RoundCube Webmail/0.4-beta Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:342 Archived-At: Ah... Okay :) I think that to have a separate tarball for the wrapper is the better way... Do you plan to generate wrapper for the others C Compiler (PCC / TinyCC...) ? Cheers, Nick On Sat, 6 Aug 2011 16:27:36 -0400, Rich Felker wrote: > On Sat, Aug 06, 2011 at 10:14:33PM +0200, nicolas@atelier-web.com wrote: >> > prefix=we_dont_use_prefix_at_all >> > includedir=/usr/include >> > libdir=/lib >> > ALL_TOOLS= >> >> Thanks :) >> And is there a way to remove the gcc wrapper ? > > Setting ALL_TOOLS blank will prevent it from being installed. > > By the way, I'm thinking of moving the gcc wrapper to a separate > repository/tarball along with improving it, at some point in the near > future. I don't really like the clutter of having it > distributed/installed with musl, and as a separate standalone tool I > could make it work with uclibc and other libcs as well.. > > I'd welcome comments from users who like or dislike this idea. > > Rich