Re: Latest pkgsrc results [What builds on musl?]

[Gregor Richards <gr@purdue.edu>]

On 07/19/2012 12:28 AM, idunham@lavabit.com wrote:
>> Here are the results from my latest build of pkgsrc on musl 0.9.2
> I presume you know there are a couple small compatability fixes since then?
> That probably won't make a *major* difference, though.
Yes, but my life's much simpler if I can just say a version, rather than 
"with git revision crazyhexstringthatmeansnothing"
>
>> Attempted:    10593
>> Deps failed:    4143
>> Build tried:    6450
>> Build failed:    1159
>> Tests failed:    302
>> Success:    4989 (77.3488%)
> So nearly half of pkgsrc builds, as it stands.
Roughly. Once I get Ruby I expect that to increase a fair bit, to over half.
>
>> Breakdown: http://sprunge.us/SFWc
>> Most valuable dependencies: http://sprunge.us/CcBV
> IIRC the wiki's not up right now, but this seems like something that would
> be useful to post there.
I was pushing on the wiki for exactly this reason ;)
>> Some notes:
>> Ruby doesn't build for stupid reasons (the docs don't build). I haven't
>> investigated, but it might be pkgsrc-specific. I'm told it works
>> elsewhere. PHP and SDL have patches I have not yet integrated.
> I can send patches for libowfat, if you want. (I know it's not great code,
> but I wanted dietsniff, so I patched both...)
I certainly won't argue.
> I may look into editors/ted and wm/icewm, since icewm is one of my
> favorite wms and Ted is the wordprocessor I usually use.
>
> Also, where is your version of pkgsrc available? Is this in with the
> snowflake repository, or elsewhere?
It's part of Snowflake. If you just want the pkgsrc patches, you can 
either use snowflake/pkgsrc-patches (broken down by package) or 
snowflake/core/patches/pkgsrc-musl.diff (all in one). Use pkgsrc 2012Q1 
for easiest patching, I haven't updated to Q2 yet. I intend to right 
about now, since this build is over.

(To listeners-in, Snowflake is http://bitbucket.org/GregorR/snowflake )

With valediction,
  - Gregor Richards