From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/1322 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregor Richards Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: Latest pkgsrc results [What builds on musl?] Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 00:33:01 -0400 Message-ID: <50078DFD.5040807@purdue.edu> References: <5007714D.7080200@purdue.edu> <59913.132.241.65.253.1342672087.squirrel@lavabit.com> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1342672395 19173 80.91.229.3 (19 Jul 2012 04:33:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 04:33:15 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-1323-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Thu Jul 19 06:33:15 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SriQM-00017i-Vf for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 06:33:15 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 24426 invoked by uid 550); 19 Jul 2012 04:33:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 24418 invoked from network); 19 Jul 2012 04:33:13 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.5) Gecko/20120624 Icedove/10.0.5 In-Reply-To: <59913.132.241.65.253.1342672087.squirrel@lavabit.com> X-PMX-Version: 5.5.9.388399 X-PerlMx-Virus-Scanned: Yes Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:1322 Archived-At: On 07/19/2012 12:28 AM, idunham@lavabit.com wrote: >> Here are the results from my latest build of pkgsrc on musl 0.9.2 > I presume you know there are a couple small compatability fixes since then? > That probably won't make a *major* difference, though. Yes, but my life's much simpler if I can just say a version, rather than "with git revision crazyhexstringthatmeansnothing" > >> Attempted: 10593 >> Deps failed: 4143 >> Build tried: 6450 >> Build failed: 1159 >> Tests failed: 302 >> Success: 4989 (77.3488%) > So nearly half of pkgsrc builds, as it stands. Roughly. Once I get Ruby I expect that to increase a fair bit, to over half. > >> Breakdown: http://sprunge.us/SFWc >> Most valuable dependencies: http://sprunge.us/CcBV > IIRC the wiki's not up right now, but this seems like something that would > be useful to post there. I was pushing on the wiki for exactly this reason ;) >> Some notes: >> Ruby doesn't build for stupid reasons (the docs don't build). I haven't >> investigated, but it might be pkgsrc-specific. I'm told it works >> elsewhere. PHP and SDL have patches I have not yet integrated. > I can send patches for libowfat, if you want. (I know it's not great code, > but I wanted dietsniff, so I patched both...) I certainly won't argue. > I may look into editors/ted and wm/icewm, since icewm is one of my > favorite wms and Ted is the wordprocessor I usually use. > > Also, where is your version of pkgsrc available? Is this in with the > snowflake repository, or elsewhere? It's part of Snowflake. If you just want the pkgsrc patches, you can either use snowflake/pkgsrc-patches (broken down by package) or snowflake/core/patches/pkgsrc-musl.diff (all in one). Use pkgsrc 2012Q1 for easiest patching, I haven't updated to Q2 yet. I intend to right about now, since this build is over. (To listeners-in, Snowflake is http://bitbucket.org/GregorR/snowflake ) With valediction, - Gregor Richards