From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/1700
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: agent <agentprog@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: build musl with clang
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 21:12:33 +0600
Message-ID: <50364861.4050107@gmail.com>
References: <5035E16E.50004@gmail.com> <20120823122414.GM27715@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <50362C19.5080509@gmail.com> <50363690.2000507@barfooze.de>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1345734839 16539 80.91.229.3 (23 Aug 2012 15:13:59 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 15:13:59 +0000 (UTC)
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-1701-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Thu Aug 23 17:13:58 2012
Return-path: <musl-return-1701-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-1701-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1T4Z6X-0000q5-6d
	for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 17:13:53 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 24445 invoked by uid 550); 23 Aug 2012 15:13:51 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 24437 invoked from network); 23 Aug 2012 15:13:51 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=CzF8XcWd2yr2GkwDxVLE5EocwRvQFAIKXUIQPmSbJKk=;
        b=Djvx/tN2x5Cm3SPfwIumWY0quXC5bbytTArCbOYP+f1KOqNRgKXffbzoAKeR9q3Yrq
         jp66eqOfNxSiK5oIABol9M/1SVBZ9xDVdy6xxVCrWzjpakNvnHJ3IYjdJhExrMU4SrcY
         S3SVNixRuUBnkOShcpNQVdRCQZPMsDf3lr56sDMgHCIvEVLh3NOWPjXiQTeGFOPBQapn
         zqL3VlSCT7GsvfYyuPU/qVTTdK1bM45BpgzDts9Udv+9RNl3QtrTVyeHcG5VTs3+MpOl
         olUaXKz4TffeshXeVJqjxH1+uV+OfRQAng6EbSxPs4L92V5RFyql960Ep/JtZQ+ZOHPT
         x/HA==
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120714 Thunderbird/14.0
In-Reply-To: <50363690.2000507@barfooze.de>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:1700
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/1700>

23.08.2012 19:56, John Spencer пишет:
> i was referring to how you have built musl; musl's configure script 
> detects broken distro toolchains and adds flags so that musl and 
> musl-gcc is built with sysv hash only.
yes, i used configure and it happily ate clang as $CC with no complaints.

23.08.2012 20:42, Szabolcs Nagy пишет:
> * John Spencer <maillist-musl@barfooze.de> [2012-08-23 15:56:32 +0200]:
>> it would be nice if richard pennington could finally invest 3
>> minutes to file a bugreport as he promised and get this annoying
>> issue out of our way.
> it does not have to be him, anyone is fine who has clang
> and can reproduce the bug
>
> http://www.openwall.com/lists/musl/2012/05/25/2
>
> for this a minimal calloc implementation is needed that
> is similar to the one in musl and clang -ffreestanding
> miscompiles it
>
release notes for clang 3.1 say something like it changed behaviour of 
-ffreestanding. i do not have 3.1 right now to check if it changed to a 
desired behaviour