From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/1999
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Luca Barbato <lu_zero@gentoo.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: filesystem layout
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 12:53:55 +0200
Message-ID: <50618D43.2000704@gentoo.org>
References: <CAPLrYERD+Tu02rRFjap-edPegLbSufbRc=RJ1qjW4OzFef+dVg@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1348570468 32343 80.91.229.3 (25 Sep 2012 10:54:28 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 10:54:28 +0000 (UTC)
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-2000-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Tue Sep 25 12:54:33 2012
Return-path: <musl-return-2000-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-2000-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1TGSmZ-0005AX-Ac
	for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 12:54:27 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 3611 invoked by uid 550); 25 Sep 2012 10:54:22 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 3597 invoked from network); 25 Sep 2012 10:54:21 -0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120801 Thunderbird/14.0
In-Reply-To: <CAPLrYERD+Tu02rRFjap-edPegLbSufbRc=RJ1qjW4OzFef+dVg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5a1pre
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:1999
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/1999>

On 09/25/2012 11:58 AM, Daniel Cegiełka wrote:
> @vision of the new platform
> 
> http://sta.li/filesystem
> 
> stali from  http://suckless.org/ proposes an alternative filesystem
> scheme. It gives clear organization of the system... but not
> compatible with FHS. What do you think of this solution? Sabotage
> distro also has its own concept...

I commend their idea of removing dbus and implementing bluez w/out it.

Hopefully a libc wouldn't require a specific fs layout.

lu