From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/2325 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregor Richards Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: Latest pkgsrc results [What builds on musl 0.9.7?] Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 21:36:47 -0800 Message-ID: <50ADB9EF.1050407@purdue.edu> References: <50AC6AD9.8050905@purdue.edu> <20121121181308.0b69d5b4.idunham@lavabit.com> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1353562623 30050 80.91.229.3 (22 Nov 2012 05:37:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 05:37:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: musl@lists.openwall.com To: Isaac Dunham Original-X-From: musl-return-2326-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Thu Nov 22 06:37:15 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TbPTO-0006A6-5u for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 06:37:14 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 24542 invoked by uid 550); 22 Nov 2012 05:37:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 24533 invoked from network); 22 Nov 2012 05:37:03 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2 In-Reply-To: <20121121181308.0b69d5b4.idunham@lavabit.com> X-PMX-Version: 5.5.9.388399 X-PerlMx-Virus-Scanned: Yes Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:2325 Archived-At: I recall looking into the Sabotage patches for Apache before, but concluding that the way pkgsrc builds Apache makes it sort of a pain. I may look into it again, but frankly it's pretty low on my priority list. The patches exist out there (in Sabotage), so it's not like musl users can't get Apache to build. Qt4 is actually near working, if I devoted some time I'm confident I could get it building. gnutls I haven't looked at, but I'd appreciate if somebody did. gimp indeed doesn't build. I'll take a look. libdrm fails due to an out of date patch for libpciaccess. I'll just have to fix that ^^´ With valediction, - Gregor Richards On 11/21/2012 06:13 PM, Isaac Dunham wrote: > On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 21:47:05 -0800 > Gregor Richards wrote: > >> Here are the results from my latest build of NetBSD pkgsrc 2012Q3 on >> musl 0.9.7, with patches from >> http://bitbucket.org/GregorR/musl-pkgsrc-patches revision 98b82c29f04c. >> >> Attempted: 10704 >> Deps failed: 3118 >> Build tried: 7586 >> Build failed: 1155 >> Tests failed: 346 >> Success: 6085 (80.2136%) > Looking good... > >> Breakdown: >> https://sites.google.com/a/codu.org/musl/pkgsrc-results/pkgsrc-results-2012Q3-98b82c29f04c-musl-0.9.7-breakdown.txt?attredirects=0&d=1 >> or http://wiki.musl-libc.org/pkgsrc_results >> Archive: >> https://sites.google.com/a/codu.org/musl/pkgsrc-results/pkgsrc-results-2012Q3-98b82c29f04c-musl-0.9.7.tar.gz?attredirects=0&d=1 >> >> >> Notes: >> >> In the breakdown, 'D' means dependencies, 'B' means build, 'T' means >> tests. Blank is success, 'X' is failure. > OK, I see that apache doesn't build...sabotage has patches for that. > OpenMotif and mpg123 should be easy fixes (they built without patching a while back); I expect it's just CFLAGS. > gnutls, Qt 3 & 4, m17n-db, and libcanberra are the most valuable dependencies. > Heirloom-libcommon looks pretty important, but that's thanks to how pkgsrc treats the heirloom toolchest. > > libusb should use the same patch as libusbx; I actually followed something on "How to build libusb for android" when I did that. > > It's claiming that the Gimp doesn't build-is that correct? > > I wonder what's blocking libdrm... > >> If you have patches to make other packages build, please report them on >> the musl-pkgsrc-patches issue tracker: >> https://bitbucket.org/GregorR/musl-pkgsrc-patches/issues . >> As with all of my repositories, musl-pkgsrc-patches is also available >> via git: http://github.com/GregorR/musl-pkgsrc-patches . >> >> If you reply to this email, please reply-all. (I am not presently >> subscribed to this mailing list, as it has no digest option.) >> >> With valediction, >> - Gregor Richards