From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/2337
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Florian Fainelli <florian@openwrt.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [musl] Support for musl libc in OpenWrt
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 20:29:34 +0100
Organization: OpenWrt
Message-ID: <50B2719E.9080004@openwrt.org>
References: <50AFD839.9010408@openwrt.org> <20121123221533.eb6d941c.idunham@lavabit.com> <201211251246.27100.florian@openwrt.org> <20121125133733.GF10895@port70.net> <50B26644.30401@barfooze.de>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1353871795 4561 80.91.229.3 (25 Nov 2012 19:29:55 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 19:29:55 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: John Spencer <maillist-musl@barfooze.de>
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-2338-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Sun Nov 25 20:30:06 2012
Return-path: <musl-return-2338-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-2338-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1Tchts-000342-Gz
	for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 20:29:56 +0100
Original-Received: (qmail 32189 invoked by uid 550); 25 Nov 2012 19:29:45 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 32180 invoked from network); 25 Nov 2012 19:29:45 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=sender:message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to
         :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=OUtH+dMaS0Ojr7bY9Kr2wRMnAJ8dbRPHT3Ur1Eu1qh0=;
        b=YegusieSARRLsw4ANKnKkUwNu4k4ClS8nswG2pPr7mPi0tRNBbWQWSQuRBPhRXXcau
         BCDf8dFhCzuFWN5BeBVM1xOTdab3AhQVBvWzbXmaYR9WNJ/ZfRlIPCuZncqXefFtIFJZ
         MV/f8BdryfXoUDE6JRfdZTHBMOyyx5GZs8ve26ofnj6yCRwbAOnFLTKG1HiTptlTPTEy
         sPOl4xQzkmm1GVIeGBEOwRi5W2pCKAsHAwx9s55F7fuXSN3q0Z1skL3LauhobZ+tvceJ
         opvmTruVGcrddwQYFHJ6wumNnTKAG9ZSP8hio/CALropC2tRc/1x2q+F2rnpKigHKct2
         i4hQ==
Original-Sender: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
In-Reply-To: <50B26644.30401@barfooze.de>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:2337
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/2337>

Le 25/11/2012 19:41, John Spencer a écrit :
> On 11/25/2012 02:37 PM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
>> * Florian Fainelli<florian@openwrt.org>  [2012-11-25 12:46:26 +0100]:
>>> Cop1 registers. After patching setjmp not to access these it works
>>> flawlessly
>>> on MIPS (big-endian) but MIPS (little-endian) still segfaults while
>>> being
>>> executed either from the kernel or qemu-mipsel.
>>>
>> so there is endian issue with dynamic linking
>
> nope, mipsel works as fine as mipseb using sabotage.
> there must be something wrong on the openwrt side.

Ok, then I will just start with more vanilla toolchains and kernel and 
see what could be going wrong. Thanks!
--
Florian