From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/2477 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Spencer Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: SoX & pipe rewinding Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 17:47:40 +0100 Message-ID: <50CB582C.9040109@barfooze.de> References: <50CB2B38.8070703@ojab.ru> <20121214134009.GJ20323@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <50CB2EEC.2040909@ojab.ru> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1355503648 32601 80.91.229.3 (14 Dec 2012 16:47:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 16:47:28 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-2478-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Fri Dec 14 17:47:43 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TjYQG-0001yb-Vx for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 17:47:41 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 26543 invoked by uid 550); 14 Dec 2012 16:47:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 26535 invoked from network); 14 Dec 2012 16:47:27 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110221 SUSE/3.1.8 Mail/1.0 In-Reply-To: <50CB2EEC.2040909@ojab.ru> Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:2477 Archived-At: On 12/14/2012 02:51 PM, ojab wrote: > > > It's completely optional (check the #else part), so question is (2): > How we can check for musl and disable pipe rewinding in this case. > If there is no musl-specific define, and there is intention not to add > one — I'll file a bug in SoX tracker with request to remove an #error. > > //wbr ojab. i think this function is completely unused as the UNUSED keyword in the declaration suggests. in that case, simply removing the function would be sufficient...