From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/2484
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: ojab <ojab@ojab.ru>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: SoX & pipe rewinding
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 01:11:22 +0400
Message-ID: <50CB95FA.8030109@ojab.ru>
References: <50CB2B38.8070703@ojab.ru> <20121214134009.GJ20323@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <50CB2EEC.2040909@ojab.ru> <20121214190924.GM20323@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1355519498 11757 80.91.229.3 (14 Dec 2012 21:11:38 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 21:11:38 +0000 (UTC)
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-2485-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Fri Dec 14 22:11:50 2012
Return-path: <musl-return-2485-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-2485-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1TjcXt-0000DQ-TD
	for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 22:11:49 +0100
Original-Received: (qmail 20252 invoked by uid 550); 14 Dec 2012 21:11:36 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 20244 invoked from network); 14 Dec 2012 21:11:36 -0000
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=google.com; s=20120113;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding
         :x-gm-message-state;
        bh=lI50MdSGadJZek70lyHcBJLvmItcVSw47liHt2VaN58=;
        b=ImkfJX714EMaU45rU5uLd3nlfG6iKBVG0PX0wK6rL3LMzHuC5nUMz3YJBopaDscw5H
         eU2/D9pl9K96Na00VRYlF1nQUTQijR6eYGGVzSy6NHQBsA/iGysxf+xzzihbH24kqtUR
         5mM2rkiBJZJD8IlddfldaonL9gCMQUna9M0iUBsETbMzUaD62OUxJnf3ZGGhw4y3ubYU
         b4JecIKR0QLDKgPobW8ZnWU9ci5/fceItHbRK+5TkeMl9Gochp/z5qztgJyJ/DzLFP6w
         z8TVu5Lf+L6weF4Zh2hT+oQ3/Gi9/Ieisq50eJX/wWMG2ElK3+hYIydZBM0RainNFceY
         IMbg==
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:20.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/20.0a1
In-Reply-To: <20121214190924.GM20323@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlGmXC5cxx88EiLpQTeHJKKIk1PgcRwYKlZeXB9mbT9z1t5pjPK8xwR5db+5P6fBghmAGZS
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:2484
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/2484>

On 14.12.2012 23:09, Rich Felker wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 05:51:40PM +0400, ojab wrote:
>
> There's intentionally no musl-specific #define. Some people have
> complained about that, but if there had been one, the state of musl
> compatibility would be a ton worse right now, because lots of software
> would be crippling itself by using #ifdef __musl__ or similar to
> disable features that musl 0.6.x didn't have...
>
> The right solution to using optional features is to test for their
> existence, but in this case, sox is not using an extension feature but
> poking at the internals of some known implementations and throwing
> #error for everything else. This is just really bad behavior. The
> default case should be portable, i.e. should just silently omit the
> non-portable pipe rewinding code.
>
> Rich
>

Filled 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3596097&group_id=10706&atid=110706

//wbr ojab