On 15.12.2012 04:47, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> * ojab<ojab@ojab.ru>  [2012-12-14 23:47:28 +0400]:
>> >On 14.12.2012 18:21, ojab wrote:
>> >?and it is still broken with gcc (GCC) 4.8.0 20121209 (experimental)
>> >
>> >awgn.c:109:5: error: void value not ignored as it ought to be
> interesting
>
>> >Filledhttp://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55695
> thanks
>

Just FYI: I've bisected gcc, first bad commit is 
http://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=a75b1c712f1eaddc69919461ead67f4ac21663fe
Looks like a bug http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31871 can 
be related.

Please note that clang also fails the testcase and the errors/warnings 
are aligned with gcc's (in the attached files).

//wbr ojab