From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/3205
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Jens Staal <staal1978@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: High-priority library replacements?
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 17:30:19 +0200
Message-ID: <51794C0B.7010304@gmail.com>
References: <20130425041553.GA13951@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <CAFipMOHu7y1Ko4L6zMzi5f7COzqkq4zFWB5y0wbgP1hTRR0gnw@mail.gmail.com> <20130425125121.GN20323@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1366903905 29263 80.91.229.3 (25 Apr 2013 15:31:45 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 15:31:45 +0000 (UTC)
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-3209-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Thu Apr 25 17:31:50 2013
Return-path: <musl-return-3209-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-3209-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1UVO9E-0005Dj-8m
	for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 17:31:48 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 31771 invoked by uid 550); 25 Apr 2013 15:31:47 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 31763 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2013 15:31:47 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject
         :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=SPY+ALTn8lmWINn2QWho8FNuu/zGWro/GchxjSiFaa4=;
        b=UXExWymiiCRWptYcpGRY2T3ed9nHN2UGbElCt3p4me+tVdfJgCXQ7qQO58vg8dXgHP
         sAJx7DRkhwKmVFs9sV+IF6MPbMaSTSD+o9wJ1c2fEKUSTtclgqvHT6gxTOb4qHemksVv
         W6XMblY2iKM8NBCRWEqsEL2nkGzJZW2DUTQt7GARmzELR3duVhas8zrfusvOb7uR4eSa
         ubN2f9IzlKdFA6IzqWBuxJtStrB/qUNytKcDIypdW9Sqg+MS2A47fcgD+CIP7R7a0MlC
         zx7xGA0HblUEwFcG0w9gE1YseJOfXxxF3dS/7MPOA/8zRFpxxhEkO4QIk/1XVaOcnDhO
         gI3g==
X-Received: by 10.180.182.110 with SMTP id ed14mr72922372wic.6.1366903896024;
        Thu, 25 Apr 2013 08:31:36 -0700 (PDT)
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130403 Thunderbird/17.0.5
In-Reply-To: <20130425125121.GN20323@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:3205
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/3205>

On 2013-04-25 14:51, Rich Felker wrote:
>> >libraries.  Someone was recently asking on the SDL list about SVG library
>> >options that are actively supported.  The only one with active  support
>> >that I could locate (besides librsvg2) was the one used by netsurf (
>> >http://www.netsurf-browser.org/projects/libsvgtiny/  ).
> How complete is it? SVG rendering is rather difficult if you want to
> support all the features, and if you don't, lots of files will come
> out looking wrong... In particular if you want to support text, you
> need a font and layout engine, and you may need clones of "standard"
> fonts that people use assuming you'll have them because they're
> included with Windows...
>
> BTW, SVG is XML-based, but I don't think a good SVG library should
> need a heavy XML library. Rather, it should take shortcuts to
> interpret just SVG content in a less-bloated way.
>

There is also an efl-related svg implementation under
http://code.google.com/p/enesim/wiki/GettingStarted

no idea how complete it is though.