You meant replacement for Mesa? Because TinyGL is software renderer. It's unlikely people will utilize software renderer. As for embedded system, each SoCs provides their own userland to utilize its hardware accelerator.

LM wrote:

On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 12:19 AM, Isaac Dunham <idunham@lavabit.com
<mailto:idunham@lavabit.com>> wrote:

A links that may be helpful, perhaps...
http://bashismal.blogspot.com/2011/10/unbloated-resources-in-c.html

Nice resource. Thanks for sharing it.

If anyone's interested in the OpenGL replacement mentioned on that
page, there are 2 other candidates similar to tinyGL. There are
picogl and sdl-tinygl. The Syllable forum (
http://forum.syllable.org/viewforum.php?f=1 ) has some interesting
information about all three of these and makes some comparisons. If I
remember, one of them has a subset of the glut functionality
included. I believe some porting is typically needed to use any of
them as a replacement for OpenGL. Speaking of glut, freeglut (
http://freeglut.sourceforge.net/ ) seems more portable and up-to-date
than glut.

Another interesting resource is picobsd (
http://code.google.com/p/freebsd-head/source/browse/release/?r=bbfa6f219c41b6850ef0e7699f439ad5488435ae#release%2Fpicobsd
). Has some small utility programs. I don't think all of them port
to other operating systems, but some of it does work.

Sincerely,
Laura