From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/4468 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rob Landley Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: Re: libgcc --disable-shared test case Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 16:38:36 -0600 Message-ID: <52D1C7EC.5090908@landley.net> References: <20131017060913.GA1957@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <1389462032.1176.18@driftwood> <20140111215106.GV24286@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <52D1BFE9.6040703@landley.net> <20140111222354.GW24286@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1389479929 25651 80.91.229.3 (11 Jan 2014 22:38:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 22:38:49 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-4472-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Sat Jan 11 23:38:55 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W27Cd-0006Jg-TI for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Sat, 11 Jan 2014 23:38:51 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 12205 invoked by uid 550); 11 Jan 2014 22:38:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 12192 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2014 22:38:51 -0000 X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=r0rfq4ZUvkEkDDPumELFZumcPqjjptCdM+0ZYYtweKs=; b=M2s0K10BE0J0WtZAdd5mWZCMhx4UYYvOhfjvC+Yuk7NvLisvm/+7Ijj/1tAPGdnS4x UJPCMhZWlCCo9YrGkA7tOwdGIkKIrocKlV31Ey66MCX1CT1hKJ+zDtd18UmcXZCJyC/p UYZU4uX5SCIbGL4P1kwLJSbR17wvUbjypFqGDVGy1YjjcO71p077Ql64blXauc76b6lg owC+yfysKgnw/3u9u5OqamsSNGOYo62UnlIFmTNdmXWGHopq26IFpiOZMP4LY5S3Pbx3 f39izzwFgtgfs6B05314YWTx7/k+XBaN1MYpbZbMN0NWW7ArAb/mw9PAEOtBBjNzkIcw 3Uww== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmf/dlMIOgS5cFwyUx19UgCBsdWPubsEn1w7o4KL3zl71vKPJCa0OQL7BtfIKZAS6MPoyLV X-Received: by 10.60.99.8 with SMTP id em8mr14463047oeb.8.1389479919056; Sat, 11 Jan 2014 14:38:39 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 In-Reply-To: <20140111222354.GW24286@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:4468 Archived-At: On 01/11/14 16:23, Rich Felker wrote: > On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 04:04:25PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote: > If you want to see the issue manifest without replacing uclibc, the > easiest way would be to check *which* libgcc symbols got pulled into > libc.so.0, then modify the test code for libfoo.so to use a feature > that will pull in one of the libgcc symbols not in libc. > > Rich My goal is to make it work, with a brick if necessary. This includes making it all work under musl. I'm already patching the libgcc.a build to produce libgcc_eh.a at inappropriate times and shoehorning in symbols that problably shouldn't go in there. (And then ccwrap is shoehorning in libgcc_eh.a when it pulls in libgcc.a.) My position on the --disable-shared gcc being subtly broken is that it's a bug in gcc I should fix (at least until replacing one more FSF project with something better). Generally if I can reproduce a problem and get enough time to work on it, I can fix it. I just wanted to make sure that my failure to reproduce this issue wasn't because I subtly screwed up. :) Rob