From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/4592 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Oliver Schneider Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: How can I assess compatibility of a statically linked binary? Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:20:51 +0000 Organization: CYREN Iceland Message-ID: <53064783.70500@f-prot.com> References: <53064077.30702@f-prot.com> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1392920462 22352 80.91.229.3 (20 Feb 2014 18:21:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:21:02 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-4596-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Thu Feb 20 19:21:07 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WGYF9-0002br-KY for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 19:21:07 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 8000 invoked by uid 550); 20 Feb 2014 18:21:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 7980 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2014 18:21:04 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0 In-Reply-To: X-Antivirus: Scanned by F-PROT Antivirus (http://www.f-prot.com) Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:4592 Archived-At: Hey Justin, > The Musl docs say which the earliest supported release is. From > memory it is late 2.4 but I don't recall the exact version. If you > don't use some functionality things might work on an earlier version > of course. thanks for the swift response, found it in the Wiki now thanks to your pointer: > Musl is built on the Linux syscall layer. Linux kernel >=2.6.39 is > necessary for POSIX conformant behaviour, older kernels will work > with varying degrees of non-conformance, 2.4 kernels will only work > for simple single-threaded applications. I had mistakenly expected it under when it was of course to be found under: Thanks, // Oliver