From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/4901 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Laurent Bercot Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: New domain! Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 21:10:32 +0100 Message-ID: <534EE3B8.2090304@skarnet.org> References: <20140416155210.GA11894@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1397679047 15112 80.91.229.3 (16 Apr 2014 20:10:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 20:10:47 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-4905-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Wed Apr 16 22:10:43 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WaWAM-0007NC-DY for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 22:10:42 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 7653 invoked by uid 550); 16 Apr 2014 20:10:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 7636 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2014 20:10:38 -0000 X-SourceIP: 80.111.163.198 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 In-Reply-To: <20140416155210.GA11894@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:4901 Archived-At: On 16/04/2014 16:52, Rich Felker wrote: > As you can see from the mail headers, we have a new domain to use: > libc.org. This is thanks to Kurt Maier (you rock!) who managed to get > it and donated it for use by musl. Now THAT is awesome. > - Using musl.libc.org subdomain as either the main website or a > redirect to the main website on the existing domain. Sounds like a given. I find musl-libc.org redirecting to musl.libc.org more elegant than the other way around, but YMMV. > - Or just being pretentious like the kernel folks (think kernel.org) > and having libc.org be the musl site. ;-) So tempting. What can we do to tempt you even more ? > - Revamped libc comparison with more rigorous results, more libcs > compared. (This is an existing project idea, but new domain is a > good place to put it.) That sounds good too, but don't you think people will question the objectivity of libc.org comparisons if the domain belongs to musl authors ? The current comparison on musl-libc.org is *expected* to be biased, even if it is not. Sigh. Managing appearances is hard. > - Information on standards, platform ABIs, etc. > - Browsable 3p man pages. > - Why ppl should care about libc, standards and interoperability, why > existence of multiple implementations of any important library is a > good thing, etc. I would love all of those. I might even contribute if I get some free time by way of divine intervention. > Further ideas or discussion of the existing ones is welcome here. e-mail addresses, of course ! Please can I have ska@libc.org, please please pretty please ? I'll draw you a kitty. Or contribute something if I can find something I'm more knowledgeable about than you guys. -- Laurent