From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/4938 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "writeonce@midipix.org" Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: static musl-based gdb and -fPIC Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 07:16:28 -0400 Message-ID: <5354FE0C.8020303@midipix.org> References: <5353FDD0.6090903@midipix.org> <20140420203140.GA26358@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <53543E99.1020407@midipix.org> <20140421073347.GB12324@port70.net> <20140421082155.GC12324@port70.net> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1398079006 13792 80.91.229.3 (21 Apr 2014 11:16:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 11:16:46 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-4942-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Mon Apr 21 13:16:41 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WcCDI-0007E8-7U for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2014 13:16:40 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 32193 invoked by uid 550); 21 Apr 2014 11:16:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 32178 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2014 11:16:38 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 In-Reply-To: <20140421082155.GC12324@port70.net> Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:4938 Archived-At: On 04/21/2014 04:21 AM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: > * Szabolcs Nagy [2014-04-21 09:33:47 +0200]: >> yes they define posix_ prefixed symbols for internal use >> which are reserved names for the c implementation when >> any standard headers are included >> >> the next posix standard defines posix_close so this is a >> real collision (and will be an issue with every conformant >> libc), but all the other posix_ symbols are wrong there too > it seems it was already reported and "fixed" > http://bugs.python.org/issue20594 > > the fix is broken though > > If I understand correctly, that "fix" is only in the 3.3/3.4 version. For llvm/clang/lldb (latest release: 3.4), though, python 2.7 is the highest supported version. zg