From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/5044 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "writeonce@midipix.org" Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: adding errc to support sed (FreeBSD) Date: Sat, 03 May 2014 23:49:24 -0400 Message-ID: <5365B8C4.9040007@midipix.org> References: <536582B8.5030304@midipix.org> <20140504000453.GA16268@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <53659931.2020309@midipix.org> <20140504015402.GB17064@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <5365A82C.1070509@midipix.org> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1399175391 20583 80.91.229.3 (4 May 2014 03:49:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 4 May 2014 03:49:51 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-5048-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Sun May 04 05:49:45 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WgnQu-0002Gk-US for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Sun, 04 May 2014 05:49:45 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 30126 invoked by uid 550); 4 May 2014 03:49:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 30118 invoked from network); 4 May 2014 03:49:43 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 In-Reply-To: Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:5044 Archived-At: On 05/03/2014 11:20 PM, M Farkas-Dyck wrote: > On 03/05/2014, writeonce@midipix.org wrote: >> Yes, but there are also some bsd-specific macros that cannot be defined >> from the command line since they take arguments. > Such macros can be so defined with GNU and OpenBSD cpp at least; what is yours? > > You are right; what I experienced with llvm/clang was unrelated to the command-line macro arguments.