From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/5202 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gustavo Zacarias Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: musl 1.0.x branch Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2014 15:26:38 -0300 Message-ID: <5393595E.40001@zacarias.com.ar> References: <20140606175617.GA3914@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1402165618 24404 80.91.229.3 (7 Jun 2014 18:26:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2014 18:26:58 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-5207-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Sat Jun 07 20:26:53 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WtLKO-0007kq-Ij for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Jun 2014 20:26:52 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 6022 invoked by uid 550); 7 Jun 2014 18:26:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 6014 invoked from network); 7 Jun 2014 18:26:50 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=zacarias.com.ar; s=dkey; t=1402165598; bh=eKYImVYbkSNtz0///x0YazNBeZGGp3EGZ7b0eakCfDM=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=n3ZIPDA0Fj1n3nX51viT26WQNWk3A3zoABcSc/S6vjOLQEN+JWLTymo3hFSdL95yu eykOoabtV7y2nDE0tEOCdG3VzPhsLPEQVuH+umjbX/AdYFf3Y6dyTQgCTYEGSbKPQA EY2BhPMfRkeVJuP7x5uqTfkfDBv3ZnCxDPsPzpiU= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 In-Reply-To: <20140606175617.GA3914@brightrain.aerifal.cx> X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.1 at loknar X-Virus-Status: Clean Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:5202 Archived-At: On 06/06/2014 02:56 PM, Rich Felker wrote: > If anyone's using 1.0.x not for the sake of stability but because it > works better in some way for your setup (e.g. size, performance, > application compatibility, etc.) please let me know about that too so > we can see if there's a reasonable way to make 1.1.x work just as well > for you. For buildroot we've been in the 1.1.x branch when support was added in, so we've got no particular interest in the 1.0.x branch. Regards.