From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/5483 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rob Landley Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: Mutt group reply Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 09:27:09 -0500 Message-ID: <53C53A3D.5080409@landley.net> References: <20140713163421.GA23050@openwall.com> <53C2D6F8.2040908@skarnet.org> <20140713205859.GA25416@openwall.com> <20140714035144.GQ179@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1405434452 7546 80.91.229.3 (15 Jul 2014 14:27:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 14:27:32 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-5488-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Tue Jul 15 16:27:25 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1X73hS-0007u1-Fj for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 16:27:22 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 11829 invoked by uid 550); 15 Jul 2014 14:27:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 11809 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2014 14:27:21 -0000 X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=3mUplDY2nyly/UD2nWEU+au8AIXhBx6GcK9bJyRLe6A=; b=avabs/7XGEqBUoe4+DLX2pwf5V5LCtMfVUaP+F8sKoZvbD3BPu2FCd9PHySDR3DKGK 40yd2tVzgB7AIEiM8QIxakfDed3pVxlbOLrjQ8FtvE9s+8aYU/zj2NAnunKMQAx8tbho ncbzWSvngvCIMqF0WoK6D2bKdwmZN/aSo/yFJRUrEA7XrMay0BaklVjaem1qqLhigqX3 MFvnYn2DsWihpju+v5t+Tn0naigGOMWB+MkSqHKIqqIBom+ImPfhXmMgaz7V2Z/akYS1 p0xMV/KaoXlHWto/IrXWVan0/dSoWJJhrwrLuMdytK98FaW6cMB6xOBFB/2KC4zafSQe CpkA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlcIxl0E3njVofktXfC0RfBkZY3+dV8AR0u2xNBndhVG9FAINNq7TIZrvep1b/U5XyPj0pZ X-Received: by 10.182.87.73 with SMTP id v9mr26162911obz.25.1405434428262; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 07:27:08 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 In-Reply-To: <20140714035144.GQ179@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:5483 Archived-At: On 07/13/14 22:51, Rich Felker wrote: > On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 12:58:59AM +0400, Solar Designer wrote: >> On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 07:59:04PM +0100, Laurent Bercot wrote: >>> On 13/07/2014 17:34, Solar Designer wrote: >>> >>>> An alternative is to reconfigure the list so that it doesn't set the >>>> Reply-To header, but this may result in many replies being inadvertently >>>> sent off-list. I think it's better for Mutt users to adopt a habit to >>>> answer that question with "n". > > Thanks! I had been looking for a solution to this issue for a long > time but didn't bother to really look into it. Thunderbird's "reply all" will _only_ reply to the reply-to, and I wind up manually copying in individual email addresses to cc: when I bother. (Yes, it has a 'reply list' button, but the reply-to header overrides the difference.) So it breaks other mail clients too. Largely because reply-to seems to be used so seldom, and thus isn't particularly debugged. (This is the only list I've followed in the past 5 years at least that uses reply-to.) >>> Mutt supports it, it just needs to be configured via an option. I can't >>> remember the details because it's been a long time, but back when I was >>> using Mutt, I did that for all the mailing-lists I was subscribed to, and >>> it worked flawlessly. >> >> This suggestion keeps coming up, but I think it's a solution to a >> different problem. The mailing list sets Reply-To to keep discussions >> on the list regardless of what MUA people are using. When the mailing >> list is configured that way, Mutt exhibits the behavior with group >> replies that I have mentioned, and the workaround is either to answer >> "n" to the question or to set the reply_to option differently: My solution is mostly just not to participate on the broken mailing list. Rob