From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/6456
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: John Spencer <maillist-musl@barfooze.de>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: fixing -fPIE + -fstack-protector-all
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 13:36:06 +0100
Message-ID: <545B6B36.6060806@barfooze.de>
References: <545A414F.8000407@barfooze.de> <20141105154303.GV22465@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <545B5F6D.4090108@opensource.dyc.edu>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1415277488 11337 80.91.229.3 (6 Nov 2014 12:38:08 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 12:38:08 +0000 (UTC)
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-6469-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Thu Nov 06 13:38:01 2014
Return-path: <musl-return-6469-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-6469-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1XmMK8-0006lm-Mg
	for gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Nov 2014 13:38:00 +0100
Original-Received: (qmail 1715 invoked by uid 550); 6 Nov 2014 12:37:59 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 1707 invoked from network); 6 Nov 2014 12:37:58 -0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
In-Reply-To: <545B5F6D.4090108@opensource.dyc.edu>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:6456
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/6456>

Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> On 11/05/14 10:43, Rich Felker wrote:
>> However, this proposed solution breaks one odd corner case: static
>> linking when all the source files were compiled with -fPIC or -fPIE.
>> In that case, there would be no references to __stack_chk_fail, only
>> to __stack_chk_fail_local, and thereby __init_ssp would not get
>> linked, and a zero canary would be used.
> 
> I would rather not see this solution.
> 

why ?