On 01/28/19 00:34, Florian Weimer wrote:
> As I explained, precisely that is not the case because the main musl
> user, Alpine Linux, builds musl with a broken toolchain that is not
> properly targeted to musl's features.  I think the official musl
> instructions have the same result.


*ahem* Adélie?  OpenWrt?  Void?  midipix?  morpheus?  Emscripten?

Alpine hardly has a monopoly on usage of musl.

Of course, since almost all of us follow the patches and configuration
of m-c-m, that's a moot point.  But the idea that "musl == Alpine" is a
harmful one, especially as the community continues to grow.

Best,
--arw


-- 
A. Wilcox (awilfox)
Project Lead, Adélie Linux
https://www.adelielinux.org