From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/7892 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Anthony G. Basile" Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: musl 1.1.10 uselocale regression, patch Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2015 14:06:55 -0400 Message-ID: <557336BF.50608@opensource.dyc.edu> References: <20150605162626.GA20452@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <55731577.1010205@opensource.dyc.edu> <20150606163140.GY17573@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1433614040 30732 80.91.229.3 (6 Jun 2015 18:07:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2015 18:07:20 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-7905-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Sat Jun 06 20:07:18 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Z1IUw-0007i1-Sq for gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org; Sat, 06 Jun 2015 20:07:11 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 5821 invoked by uid 550); 6 Jun 2015 18:07:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 5802 invoked from network); 6 Jun 2015 18:07:08 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 In-Reply-To: <20150606163140.GY17573@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:7892 Archived-At: On 6/6/15 12:31 PM, Rich Felker wrote: > On Sat, Jun 06, 2015 at 11:44:55AM -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote: >> On 6/5/15 12:26 PM, Rich Felker wrote: >>> A new regression in uselocale made it into musl 1.1.10. All users >>> should apply the attached patch. >> >> I'm skipping 1.1.9 for all the gentoo stages (mostly because the >> mips bug was a show stopper). I can backport this patch, but is >> there a new release on the horizon given that this is a significant >> bug? > > I'm not planning to insert another release cycle to deal with it. If > users are unhappy with having to download and apply the patch > separately, I might make (and sign) a 1.1.10a tarball for convenience. > Let me know if that's something you want to see happen. > > Rich > Nope. I don't need that. The point is if a new release was immenant I would just wait because there's some work invovled in building and pushing these stages out, and I like doing one for each release of musl. So we're good :) -- Anthony G. Basile, Ph. D. Chair of Information Technology D'Youville College Buffalo, NY 14201 (716) 829-8197