From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/8753 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?P=c3=a1draig_Brady?= Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: _STRING_ARCH_unaligned or equivalent definition Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 10:21:31 +0100 Message-ID: <562B4D9B.5070100@draigBrady.com> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1445685263 31909 80.91.229.3 (24 Oct 2015 11:14:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 11:14:23 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-8766-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Sat Oct 24 13:14:22 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZpwmE-0005nI-1f for gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 13:14:22 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 26375 invoked by uid 550); 24 Oct 2015 11:14:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 7269 invoked from network); 24 Oct 2015 09:21:44 -0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AiELANxMK1ZtTdTL/2dsb2JhbABdKII8UoMLvlmGEwEBgTZMAQEBAQEBgQuEXA8Bbg0CBRYLAgsDAgECAVgIAQGIMAGjMI9xhW+MeYEihFqLJIJSgUUFljaWUoV2jQljgUoBAQgBAQEBgiw9h0wBAQE User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:8753 Archived-At: Hi, I was writing some code which uses faster word at a time but possibly unaligned access when we know that unaligned access is OK, i.e. #if _STRING_ARCH_unaligned provided by glibc. I would like not to fall back to the slower path on musl. Is there a similar define for musl. Is is worth proposing a standard define somewhere? thanks, Pádraig.