From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/8753
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: =?UTF-8?Q?P=c3=a1draig_Brady?=
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: _STRING_ARCH_unaligned or equivalent definition
Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 10:21:31 +0100
Message-ID: <562B4D9B.5070100@draigBrady.com>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1445685263 31909 80.91.229.3 (24 Oct 2015 11:14:23 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 11:14:23 +0000 (UTC)
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-8766-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Sat Oct 24 13:14:22 2015
Return-path:
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from )
id 1ZpwmE-0005nI-1f
for gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 13:14:22 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 26375 invoked by uid 550); 24 Oct 2015 11:14:19 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Unsubscribe:
List-Subscribe:
Original-Received: (qmail 7269 invoked from network); 24 Oct 2015 09:21:44 -0000
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AiELANxMK1ZtTdTL/2dsb2JhbABdKII8UoMLvlmGEwEBgTZMAQEBAQEBgQuEXA8Bbg0CBRYLAgsDAgECAVgIAQGIMAGjMI9xhW+MeYEihFqLJIJSgUUFljaWUoV2jQljgUoBAQgBAQEBgiw9h0wBAQE
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/38.3.0
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:8753
Archived-At:
Hi,
I was writing some code which uses faster word at a time
but possibly unaligned access when we know that unaligned
access is OK, i.e. #if _STRING_ARCH_unaligned provided by glibc.
I would like not to fall back to the slower path on musl.
Is there a similar define for musl. Is is worth proposing
a standard define somewhere?
thanks,
Pádraig.