From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/1618 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: idunham@lavabit.com Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: [PATCH] vm86 syscall wrappers Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 20:58:56 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <57347.132.241.65.36.1345165136.squirrel@lavabit.com> References: <5370.132.241.65.36.1345163548.squirrel@lavabit.com> <502D9503.50505@gentoo.org> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1345165150 6104 80.91.229.3 (17 Aug 2012 00:59:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 00:59:10 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-1619-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Fri Aug 17 02:59:10 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1T2Au5-0002ZV-OF for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 02:59:09 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 13930 invoked by uid 550); 17 Aug 2012 00:59:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 13922 invoked from network); 17 Aug 2012 00:59:08 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lavabit; d=lavabit.com; b=Wi78fRqdxRYXzHswTpcBWygfABsN8Lr46eIKv+gGK/FZFYF/U4Wg6OHwICNWsP/iJYloVpobrgBPypA1PX12GZrgOdJSZplL9L67V0ujVgaTHeUZcewjVgxuiVAZ+1EB026NAxg4l3XUTEFETBeI9cDmoki4LgYexT9JPdt3TGo=; h=Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Subject:From:To:User-Agent:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; In-Reply-To: <502D9503.50505@gentoo.org> User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.13 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:1618 > On 08/17/2012 02:32 AM, idunham@lavabit.com wrote: >> + unsigned long is_vm86pus:1; > > typo? Nope, that's what asm/vm86.h calls it. (note: rather than #include files from the kernel headers, I followed the standing practice for musl and copied the relevant definitions, without any comments. This means you don't need to install kernel headers for the target before you can cross-compile)