From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/10890 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "A. Wilcox" Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: [PATCH] drop lchmod Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2017 18:39:11 -0600 Organization: =?UTF-8?Q?Ad=c3=a9lie_Linux?= Message-ID: <586D95AF.7090207@adelielinux.org> References: <20170104213552.GR1555@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1483576769 15422 195.159.176.226 (5 Jan 2017 00:39:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 00:39:29 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-10903-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Thu Jan 05 01:39:25 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by blaine.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cOw5U-0003JZ-Dw for gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2017 01:39:24 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 23908 invoked by uid 550); 5 Jan 2017 00:39:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Original-Received: (qmail 23887 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2017 00:39:26 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20170104213552.GR1555@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:10890 Archived-At: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 04/01/17 15:35, Rich Felker wrote: > libarchive needs to be fixed to respect the errno value. https://github.com/libarchive/libarchive/commit/65fe103 We had to ship this patch in Adélie for the v3.1.x branch, but 3.2+ integrates it, and it works fine on musl without patching here. Julien, can you reproduce any sort of failure with libarchive-3.2 or newer? Or is this in another package? Perhaps more information would be useful. At any rate, there is no reason to drop this function. - --arw - -- A. Wilcox (awilfox) Project Lead, Adélie Linux http://adelielinux.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJYbZWsAAoJEMspy1GSK50UFtUP/3lvELJsq140Ilt+m6q0jBxv yCdDtMlobtIGiF34AjYJw0OiABWU0lz+UE6WAV+yIgwHnvbiHmiGMAv72ZbbuFkP MWzrqzQFyVwJMzjLz/cf+qvZlnrIdDq7GhK8i2e42iyx0HWMC59I7NuEFmAIUjzx QT6n8/OIO36wNG1om6E0qiLQZFuJ+m2lk8hWTHHQTqxQwbKX1ybsRN+ZfbMpe9+P NuIInTHuchtvyxZQU6fqHYciDIU2140go93HHGNiprfw8OO8wqpOIWGwJ7XypR7B QLB5WvkquL3y34GF0TX976+l9qjAyDYuZ72p8XMaI+Q9ExZ5okq0CKIz3L7LD9aN 9ZPvHZwo33Zc6QJ0wIR95JedoLowD4FKhzCJYwR0mKxR8dBGDaDkh35exC5bDDCQ DrPIKoh6dQKvEDZkKbpfjyY7INZtw36uD9J083VTxLPk2aNg22g04CFmxbOGSkgF Pl8gCMNCVj9sKm8mG7TY4eYJf6Bbycg6hL9rwDPryfA6Rx4D3+oCIj8yKVc981PQ 5Fjyfb5ROGfu7JtoYWfrOG76xJh2PgqTs1d7KmAuaBKyinZ56ZQ25xBnEGV+RXbA xkDG7AB5a6flNZTUFXK69KSAQiwzuGR1hDfOdQTc6DlZwCYkgxgeCQR6okmKHA/6 nkdWdV64DcDhKBYVym1C =K5su -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----