From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/11346 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "A. Wilcox" Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: SPARCv9 Support Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 19:25:40 -0500 Organization: =?UTF-8?Q?Ad=c3=a9lie_Linux?= Message-ID: <591CEA04.2060309@adelielinux.org> References: <20170424135456.GR17319@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1495067426 1030 195.159.176.226 (18 May 2017 00:30:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 00:30:26 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-11361-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Thu May 18 02:30:22 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by blaine.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dB9Kf-00008Y-QU for gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 May 2017 02:30:21 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 14330 invoked by uid 550); 18 May 2017 00:30:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Original-Received: (qmail 14312 invoked from network); 18 May 2017 00:30:24 -0000 X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 In-Reply-To: <20170424135456.GR17319@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:11346 Archived-At: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 24/04/17 08:54, Rich Felker wrote: > On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 09:39:28AM -0400, Rob Lyerly wrote: >> Hello, >> >> We've been using musl as a libc alternative for ARMv8 and x86-64 >> for a year now and want to also use it for work we're starting >> on a SPARCv9 machine. Has anybody done any porting of musl to >> this architecture or would we have to port it ourselves? > > I'm not aware of any work porting to SPARC yet, but there has been > some level of interest from others in the past. I know it's a bit late, but I hadn't had email access for most of the month of April. I am one of the ones who has an interest, and I would be willing to test on my SPARC hardware. I have two SPARCv9s, an Enterprise 220R @ 360MHz, and a Fire V110 @ 650MHz. Would also be willing to contribute an eye to code review, but my SPARC is a bit rusty (it dates to when the V110 was a current machine). - --arw - -- A. Wilcox (awilfox) Project Lead, Adélie Linux http://adelielinux.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJZHOn+AAoJEMspy1GSK50U32oP/RHA8aT/U3nmlY8WCrW5Uy7P Mx4MORp5raYB4X08S1aePQ57vrBbxh2jvjH/gv/n401Kn/e+557dqZtJu2dgS1Ql Lk2IAu+LHIeuHT2sKCQAtFDwfeLBQUK/te7Hj8pOC/b9e8tDPpcwL8sMl+Ph19G1 DzHbradHeLWS/Hw/BWBIRjRH5kZsGmkPQWAZGWDNelBqRoDIpIWarZcxq59YCReQ httma+aMhhzZ+9vdlFWKMvQaQi5IvIlRFxPH3Nj+xW8ocIkR8JMjdngRspvoguJ7 jkZr7zSa3A5YFJ9/bJmsim7PD0biD1AiWhqz866qec4Z8U9nrXXv/gQEjhhrsC5g CSAXii4w5fu9jMgCmVTXyfvO564u2T40bpHAXKVZdhzXIODEyFKxFeglN5OjZHaH EFlBtlcFTWSFdGI8A6Bsfa20Dd66bwOhekfBAtHwGgr6HjIS1sy08magT1v/4BNk sWuJTrz7bEyOJhfr4yCNLvxXxc47/rm/KUeDlRPBO08/3IOzWUVLJ0B2FLEi0yEb 9+r8lN/rTi7ScLPvroWjmiIPYTPioBp0JQ8/jR8ZOh9ss0/JfjFVq1jEtADAGbaX gOVYjDQbJEioIvhtiPRcSU/o2tGvQM1jNVrG+YWskS+CKWgI/n+Vt5id1TxjoYBF I4qsWsjht5CAjGcs0d5c =35oq -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----