From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: from second.openwall.net (second.openwall.net [193.110.157.125]) by inbox.vuxu.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 473D92B948 for ; Mon, 7 Jul 2025 05:17:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 30545 invoked by uid 550); 7 Jul 2025 03:17:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com x-ms-reactions: disallow Received: (qmail 30505 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2025 03:17:05 -0000 Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2025 13:16:50 +1000 (AEST) From: Damian McGuckin To: MUSL In-Reply-To: <20250706213149.GJ288056@port70.net> Message-ID: <6394c265-fb10-cc53-5e2-bdb26dc2591e@esi.com.au> References: <20250706213149.GJ288056@port70.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Subject: [musl] Re: spam>Re: [musl] Comment in ccosh() On Sun, 6 Jul 2025, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: >> Am I being overly pedantic? > > i guess the comment is sloppy > > i think if you submit such a patch it can be accepted. > > (or reword it in another way so it is not actually false) I will ponder what seems optimal and make a suggestion. Mind you, MUSL is way in front of GNU libc which simply took comments from the double version of sinh() and cosh() and used then in the float and long double variants. So the float routine talks about maxdouble but uses constants which are related to maxfloat!! And likewise in the long double routine. Thanks - Damian