Dear ALL, Return value of ulimit(UL_GETFSIZE) in X32 architecture seems to be wrong. Here is the implementation of ulimit function in MUSL 1.1.22: #include #include #include long ulimit(int cmd, ...) { struct rlimit rl; getrlimit(RLIMIT_FSIZE, &rl); if (cmd == UL_SETFSIZE) { long val; va_list ap; va_start(ap, cmd); val = va_arg(ap, long); va_end(ap); rl.rlim_cur = 512ULL * val; if (setrlimit(RLIMIT_FSIZE, &rl)) return -1; } return rl.rlim_cur / 512; } Make it simple in case of "cmd = UL_GETFSIZE", ulimit function becomes to be: long ulimit(int cmd, ...) { struct rlimit rl; getrlimit(RLIMIT_FSIZE, &rl); return rl.rlim_cur / 512; } rl.rlim in ulimit function is the type of long long(8 Byte), however the return value in X32 architecture is the type of long(4 Byte). So in that case, rl.rlim_cur / 512 would be larger than 0x7fffffff and ulimit function returns -1. I also tried an experiment to improve my opinion as follows. [benchmark] $ cat ulimit_test.c #include #include int main() { printf("ret:%d\n", ulimit(UL_GETFSIZE)); return 0; } [testcase] Environment: Linux 4.4.171 #1 SMP Thu Apr 25 00:39:22 UTC 2019 armv7l GNU/Linux $ /tmp # ulimit -f unlimited $ /tmp # ./ulimit_test ret:-1 $ /tmp # cp musl/libc.so /usr/lib/ // copy a new MUSL libc.so with my [patch] $ /tmp # ./ulimit_test ret:2147483647 // 0x7fffffff [patch] --- diff --git a/src/legacy/ulimit.c b/src/legacy/ulimit.c index 1f59e8e..d1620e6 100644 --- a/src/legacy/ulimit.c +++ b/src/legacy/ulimit.c @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include long ulimit(int cmd, ...) { @@ -15,5 +16,5 @@ long ulimit(int cmd, ...) rl.rlim_cur = 512ULL * val; if (setrlimit(RLIMIT_FSIZE, &rl)) return -1; } - return rl.rlim_cur / 512; + return rl.rlim_cur == RLIM_INFINITY ? LONG_MAX : rl.rlim_cur / 512; } --- Looking forward to your reply. Best regards. Cheng Liu