From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/15016 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Florian Weimer Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: max_align_t mess on i386 Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2019 18:51:50 +0100 Message-ID: <871rt6eqx5.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> References: <20191214151932.GW1666@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="212983"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: musl@lists.openwall.com To: Rich Felker Original-X-From: musl-return-15032-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Sat Dec 14 18:52:50 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by blaine.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1igBaz-000tHg-Nw for gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2019 18:52:49 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 9815 invoked by uid 550); 14 Dec 2019 17:52:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Original-Received: (qmail 9792 invoked from network); 14 Dec 2019 17:52:46 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20191214151932.GW1666@brightrain.aerifal.cx> (Rich Felker's message of "Sat, 14 Dec 2019 10:19:32 -0500") Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:15016 Archived-At: * Rich Felker: > However, whatever we do with i386, the option of using 8-byte > granularity remains open for all the other 32-bit archs, most of which > tend to be used with machines far more memory-constrained than i386. Note that powerpc has a similar issue, but with long double: But perhaps musl follows the old powerpc ABI, where double and long double are both binary64 (I have not checked, sorry).