From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: from second.openwall.net (second.openwall.net [193.110.157.125]) by inbox.vuxu.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4DE812A776 for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2025 17:35:03 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 25787 invoked by uid 550); 7 Feb 2025 16:34:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com x-ms-reactions: disallow Received: (qmail 25758 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2025 16:34:57 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1738946089; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=cn6b6nYPPIAS9G/GQA1k+s+qNI+6puRvdnisvkJ5ooc=; b=b2N3HnpiVCZeC3bxN0NmG/+4Y84erG9eO3OGQB1dv7iFPWMzNqp37IBcMy0uhbvfw3DB5y PHzftbDoS7mZKcAXsgcXMz0vRxY7AjQsE+cc4+IBAPhuj0/rdFmNY2U5pKoAsv5p6xao0s 3kbeNIbUU9R3Wr30yIGzMI6BECMA5Jk= X-MC-Unique: w7dzaIe_OTG3q6CrvTyYYA-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: w7dzaIe_OTG3q6CrvTyYYA From: Florian Weimer To: Daniele Personal Cc: Rich Felker , musl@lists.openwall.com In-Reply-To: (Daniele Personal's message of "Thu, 06 Feb 2025 08:45:14 +0100") References: <20250128150258.GS10433@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <87cyg6iyo8.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> <455063b99060bfd0d01aff1666ebb3892e001256.camel@gmail.com> <878qqpbqk7.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> <1bd9cb5599cbc4d55b342b1b4cb4b138b9c48a5b.camel@gmail.com> <87ed0fj5yi.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> <20250204185340.GT10433@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <87wme4hebo.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2025 17:34:39 +0100 Message-ID: <8734gpvhls.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.40 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-MFC-PROC-ID: TBIPVUIuSPqO9oSjHfVzQg6QmsA8vOUgrJQ75DzOa3s_1738946084 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [musl] pthread_mutex_t shared between processes with different pid namespaces * Daniele Personal: >> As a result, it's definitely [not] just a userspace-only change if >> you need to use the robust mutex list across PID namespaces. >>=20 > > I tried to understand what you mean here but can't: can you please > explain me which userspace-only change is needed? Sorry, there was a =E2=80=9Dnot=E2=80=9D missing in the quoted conclusion. Florian