From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.4
Received: (qmail 31770 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2023 12:13:37 -0000
Received: from second.openwall.net (193.110.157.125)
  by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 5 Apr 2023 12:13:37 -0000
Received: (qmail 3707 invoked by uid 550); 5 Apr 2023 12:13:34 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-ID: <musl.lists.openwall.com>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Received: (qmail 3682 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2023 12:13:34 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com;
	s=mimecast20190719; t=1680696802;
	h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
	 to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
	 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
	bh=b237PXRbDid/epfYwBA9ahb4fsQUYWNyOIokAn2vzMg=;
	b=QCflyg/TsaJGzU5hXneEn9EwAK5zYpQ18BTEd72v8qLunQzhHqSzBVs44WyJWu7qbCzHW4
	LkOcUksxyeLPF0PIcx2sLeNp2YmMcG17C0CXFmH79tM8l+VlTFn8EozqE9G3jMLRPWzbdd
	jmyc6xfod40gTKpZRDduY0cZa72zCGI=
X-MC-Unique: MRbl2GVgNpO8_sJJVpcKvA-1
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
Cc: musl@lists.openwall.com
References: <20230405115445.GG3298@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2023 14:13:16 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20230405115445.GG3298@brightrain.aerifal.cx> (Rich Felker's
	message of "Wed, 5 Apr 2023 07:54:46 -0400")
Message-ID: <874jpule77.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.9
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com
Content-Type: text/plain
Subject: [musl] Re: [PATCH v9 0/13] implement dlmem() function (fwd)

* Rich Felker:

> Well this is disturbing. We probably need to fix gcc here (and a lot
> of code in the wild may be broken) because musl has no such locking
> where it doesn't belong.

We have a helper function in glibc (_dl_find_object) that replaces all
the previous object traversal logic and caching in libgcc, so it's no
longer an issue with current gcc and glibc.  Unfortunately that means
that the generic dl_iterate_phdr code will be fixed by adding its own
locking.

Thanks,
Florian