From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 15139 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2022 04:48:40 -0000 Received: from second.openwall.net (193.110.157.125) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 11 Jul 2022 04:48:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 12175 invoked by uid 550); 11 Jul 2022 04:48:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com Received: (qmail 12155 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2022 04:48:36 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1657514904; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=z3wNTk1EmlWgQ40bLvn/jrHb2kJ9bS6JZQqVFlZyf7M=; b=jOb/g9JN297sLU9IwmS7Llq/+BzfcdX5iAGhMFiWnoCh9QXZovtr5OSY7+ObRVvKCIpp5r s7tZpbZNAOjcTYceaT0wOKIvUQvqOaIvp0Kd1eQgIBeLPEfJnyI8XkeAmedGmhW7SuLqpD YAeIVSEd2hmhDnjdP2QuUt4POQ8THag= X-MC-Unique: 8yUKyYMwOGmO5uupyvb23g-1 From: Florian Weimer To: Tomasz Duda Cc: musl@lists.openwall.com References: Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 06:48:04 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Tomasz Duda's message of "Sun, 10 Jul 2022 16:32:51 +0200") Message-ID: <875yk48dbv.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.11.54.5 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=fweimer@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [musl] AF_LOCAL * Tomasz Duda: > I'm using > python:3.9-alpine3.14 > It looks that AF_LOCAL is not implemented. > It would be nice if you could include it. There are multiple incompatible implementations of AF_LOCAL for getnameinfo. Some put the path into the host, others put it into the service. I'm not sure if it's a good idea to implement it. Thanks, Florian