From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <musl-return-20856-ml=inbox.vuxu.org@lists.openwall.com>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4,
	RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Received: from second.openwall.net (second.openwall.net [193.110.157.125])
	by inbox.vuxu.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2B89220DD2
	for <ml@inbox.vuxu.org>; Sun, 21 Apr 2024 12:31:46 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (qmail 8072 invoked by uid 550); 21 Apr 2024 10:31:43 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-ID: <musl.lists.openwall.com>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Received: (qmail 8037 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2024 10:31:42 -0000
From: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
To: =?utf-8?B?SuKCkeKCmeKCmw==?= Gustedt <jens.gustedt@inria.fr>
Cc: Markus Wichmann <nullplan@gmx.net>,  musl@lists.openwall.com
In-Reply-To: <20240421122358.33440bcb@inria.fr> ("J. =?utf-8?B?4oKR4oKZ?=
 =?utf-8?B?4oKb?= Gustedt"'s message of
	"Sun, 21 Apr 2024 12:23:58 +0200")
Organization: Gentoo
References: <3KDMGHI91MHTL.24XCHF6E4X1XG@mforney.org>
	<ZiScBGsFLZz4-GLw@voyager> <20240421091605.4b4e7d2e@inria.fr>
	<ZiTCflgUNfvtT96w@voyager> <20240421122358.33440bcb@inria.fr>
User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.4; emacs 30.0.50
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2024 11:31:29 +0100
Message-ID: <87h6fv57ni.fsf@gentoo.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [musl] Alignment attribute in headers

J=E2=82=91=E2=82=99=E2=82=9B Gustedt <jens.gustedt@inria.fr> writes:

> Markus,
>
> on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 09:38:38 +0200 you (Markus Wichmann
> <nullplan@gmx.net>) wrote:
>
>> Am Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 09:16:05AM +0200 schrieb J=E2=82=91=E2=82=99=E2=
=82=9B Gustedt:
>> > Since this is unified starting with C23 and I think we morally
>> > should have C conformance first and fallbacks only if imperatively
>> > needed I would go for
>> >=20=20
>>=20
>> Ugh. Let the bike shedding begin. I will tell you that moral arguments
>> about software don't make a lot of sense to me, though.
>
> I am not a native speaker, but I think this is generally used as
> figure of speech for "there got reasons to do something".

I understood what you meant and it's an idiom I've seen before. Don't
worry.