From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/14489
Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: Support SIGEV_THREAD_ID
Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2019 18:24:31 +0200
Message-ID: <87h870hn0g.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com>
References: <CAA2zVHoRQzQM6zc4Qvc7abwB4=EWotrN5ntoN6nw986OkGEFKw@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226";
	logging-data="82127"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux)
Cc: musl@lists.openwall.com
To: James Y Knight <jyknight@google.com>
Original-X-From: musl-return-14505-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Thu Aug 01 18:24:49 2019
Return-path: <musl-return-14505-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by blaine.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.89)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-14505-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1htDsm-000LFp-SM
	for gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 18:24:48 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 12000 invoked by uid 550); 1 Aug 2019 16:24:46 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-ID: <musl.lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 11977 invoked from network); 1 Aug 2019 16:24:45 -0000
In-Reply-To: <CAA2zVHoRQzQM6zc4Qvc7abwB4=EWotrN5ntoN6nw986OkGEFKw@mail.gmail.com>
	(James Y. Knight's message of "Thu, 1 Aug 2019 12:15:57 -0400")
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.49]); Thu, 01 Aug 2019 16:24:34 +0000 (UTC)
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:14489
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/14489>

* James Y. Knight:

> There seems to be some debate in glibc over whether this API should be
> supported, due to the long-standing debate about "pthread_t" vs
> "kernel tid" APIs. (And this API uses kernel tids, of course.)

The debate is over and has been decided in favor of supporting TIDs.  We
just have a backlog of interfaces for which we need to add support.

Fortunately, C++ is standardizing stackless coroutines, so this has not
been proven to be a mistake.

Thanks,
Florian