From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <musl-return-15345-ml=inbox.vuxu.org@lists.openwall.com>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,
	HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,
	RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SUBJ_OBFU_PUNCT_FEW,
	SUBJ_OBFU_PUNCT_MANY autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
Received: from mother.openwall.net (mother.openwall.net [195.42.179.200])
	by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with SMTP id 914a0792
	for <ml@inbox.vuxu.org>;
	Thu, 30 Jan 2020 17:09:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 10035 invoked by uid 550); 30 Jan 2020 17:09:39 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-ID: <musl.lists.openwall.com>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Received: (qmail 10017 invoked from network); 30 Jan 2020 17:09:39 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com;
	s=mimecast20190719; t=1580404167;
	h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
	 to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
	 content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:
	 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
	bh=Ee4SpYNvJ0hylH2jB9ypUNtT5NHZXaJjSLYvv2ocF6Y=;
	b=cKbAL2BBEqXLi2fVJJ6Y5Am6ll9vH7rLd9X9c32nnlkrU/ugQo0fH2sKMHLm/X6pQAtA9s
	kEPJMYnR2jGzufUaciBbzxCU5vDjUWWmGwIvZnCTvkAkzmbrw8Lylb6tl6eq6MvgnZh7Wr
	cDIBxODVEW2TyS9rRFe1wDUvpYKL3hY=
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
Cc: musl@lists.openwall.com
References: <20200130163853.GA1663@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2020 18:09:08 +0100
In-Reply-To: <20200130163853.GA1663@brightrain.aerifal.cx> (Rich Felker's
	message of "Thu, 30 Jan 2020 11:38:53 -0500")
Message-ID: <87k1583m8b.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15
X-MC-Unique: ORuq7lLZMXKVAFvsBlDAeA-1
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [musl] [RFC] removing SYS_clock_gettime & SYS_gettimeofday

* Rich Felker:

> I think I'd like to go ahead with this patch, discussed in a previous
> thread. Does it look okay? Should I add any other syscalls that are
> absolutely not valid to use anymore (as opposed to the ones with
> optional timeouts, which I won't remove, because musl doesn't break
> valid code to catch bugs) to the list?

I think this change needs to be reflected in the UAPI headers in some
way, too.

Thanks,
Florian