From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/13521 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Florian Weimer Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: DNS resolver patch Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2018 21:36:01 +0100 Message-ID: <87pnuegzpq.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> References: <1934405743.3003283.1544074315707.JavaMail.zimbra@totalphase.com> <87r2eu1zbc.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> <20181206164820.07cc96f4@ncopa-desktop.copa.dup.pw> <87ftvaiknn.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> <466f7852-8535-38d7-afe5-23eb491842d8@adelielinux.org> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1544128453 20555 195.159.176.226 (6 Dec 2018 20:34:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 20:34:13 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) Cc: musl@lists.openwall.com To: "A. Wilcox" Original-X-From: musl-return-13537-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Thu Dec 06 21:34:09 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by blaine.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gV0LY-0005FF-5Z for gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Dec 2018 21:34:08 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 28288 invoked by uid 550); 6 Dec 2018 20:36:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Original-Received: (qmail 28268 invoked from network); 6 Dec 2018 20:36:16 -0000 In-Reply-To: <466f7852-8535-38d7-afe5-23eb491842d8@adelielinux.org> (A. Wilcox's message of "Thu, 6 Dec 2018 12:38:37 -0600") X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.44]); Thu, 06 Dec 2018 20:36:04 +0000 (UTC) Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:13521 Archived-At: * A. Wilcox: > On 12/06/18 12:18, Florian Weimer wrote: >> The alternative, using a NOERROR/NODATA response, confuses musl search >> processing. > > ??? > > The musl resolver should be able to handle a resolver returning NODATA. > That is popular for having a separate extranet infrastructure - your > extranet DNS only contains records for your local domain and returns > NODATA for requests outside that domain. > > If you are correct that such a response "confuses musl search > processing", that's a bug in musl that needs to be fixed. I don't know if it was merged. Florian