From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 6498 invoked from network); 19 May 2021 12:40:00 -0000 Received: from mother.openwall.net (195.42.179.200) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 19 May 2021 12:40:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 5495 invoked by uid 550); 19 May 2021 12:39:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com Received: (qmail 5459 invoked from network); 19 May 2021 12:39:56 -0000 X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|tuliom@ascii.art.br X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|tuliom@ascii.art.br X-MC-Relay: Neutral X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|tuliom@ascii.art.br X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost X-Harmony-Bottle: 414366c233488d91_1621427981418_23098169 X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1621427981418:425922509 X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1621427981418 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=ascii.art.br; h=from:to:cc :subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=ascii.art.br; bh=Moiw1J8H3kFxYbF9Og3ijiVM3XY=; b= TI2OTUkb2gOk2/7xGzALPcJAIQiK+aa2a2Xcsj0Ub7UyauxJc5A2N2962czBl/nX QG18QIdDGFE1Wt5XFvq9ia/CnpPWTjl7a6Oyv2xAV9bE8m5JibK1tGCVCW1Igctb dvmp2xy1ygBzlKUeZdXMk8VhoioaFduOrZvLhbSueI8= X-DH-BACKEND: pdx1-sub0-mail-a6 From: Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho To: Nicholas Piggin , "Dmitry V. Levin" Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org, musl@lists.openwall.com, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, libc-dev@lists.llvm.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org In-Reply-To: <1621421721.r9fefebis8.astroid@bobo.none> References: <20200611081203.995112-1-npiggin@gmail.com> <20210518231331.GA8464@altlinux.org> <1621385544.nttlk5qugb.astroid@bobo.none> <20210519102403.GA15207@altlinux.org> <1621421721.r9fefebis8.astroid@bobo.none> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.31.3 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/27.2 (x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 09:39:33 -0300 Message-ID: <87r1i2kid6.fsf@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: [musl] Re: Linux powerpc new system call instruction and ABI Nicholas Piggin via Libc-alpha writes: > As a more hacky thing you could make a syscall with -1 and see how > the error looks, and then assume all syscalls will be the same. I'm not sure this would work. Even in glibc, it's expected that early syscalls will use sc while scv is used later in the execution. -- Tulio Magno