From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/619 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: aep Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: license survey results Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 17:55:48 +0100 Message-ID: <889243fc30d601eb627f0ae3df7fe568@exys.org> References: <20120228015557.GJ184@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1331052708 19330 80.91.229.3 (6 Mar 2012 16:51:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 16:51:48 +0000 (UTC) To: Original-X-From: musl-return-620-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Tue Mar 06 17:51:47 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1S4xc2-0004Cr-9n for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 17:51:46 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 11979 invoked by uid 550); 6 Mar 2012 16:51:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 11971 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2012 16:51:45 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20120228015557.GJ184@brightrain.aerifal.cx> X-Sender: aep@exys.org User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.5.4 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:619 Archived-At: > In summary, it looks like everyone except Luka (and perhaps aep) who > responded would like to see at least *some* additional level of > permissiveness to musl's license terms, For me each of those options is sufficient. Was just showing a not-mentioned alternative ;) Glad to see the majority is leaning towards BSD. Says something about musls users and direction.