From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: from second.openwall.net (second.openwall.net [193.110.157.125]) by inbox.vuxu.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3BEF3236A7 for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2024 05:40:18 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 26248 invoked by uid 550); 7 Nov 2024 04:40:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com x-ms-reactions: disallow Received: (qmail 26210 invoked from network); 7 Nov 2024 04:40:11 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=boeing.com; s=boeing-s1912; t=1730954402; bh=pfQNUU8Ec9JpctuGcEuvNV2JfbV5cMxqNHcB5wVRIEM=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:From; b=T7zXLQr9/ymEqAcsqT87S3uEgBbdbCu18FiPaT2Lzd0QuSKBLewHSc5gGhhygQtVd ho66tNTkCVfGFQ5DdNqYYkgjmCA2p1VBDHH0YsXThD/+yhnij/I8UgEQAo7zboAS2o AaptnGLf6Aa5G8+vTzyyw9hiKV6a8iQ7fKmgEujlDEJ+vHr1jXns52RISHSryU5gbU IDo8tAVn+ITvJaYjm9NY78OKEo2ly0QJKGpZf7gHzFJYwiR3OWcLA/mk+d8anOa6zu j6TODSukdZOcCCQCYL2X2M+wVGwpXvPl7y/a4r35VUm9O0uee1XfVykeE1kdtwFeLX 6MBTJdc84wIeg== From: "Gardner, Ryan P" To: "musl@lists.openwall.com" Thread-Topic: [musl] [PATCH 1/3 libc-test] functional:time:clock_nanosleep test Thread-Index: AdswziQKGjEgkfmtTuGO4zCp7jgh2g== Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2024 04:39:59 +0000 Message-ID: <88f3122170794590afdbeb4d86d394f9@boeing.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [137.137.12.6] x-tm-snts-smtp: 8DC87DB51D46A37423D89AF2552111B9FC239DD95FC055C9A559958681E12CAF2000:8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 Subject: Re: [musl] [PATCH 1/3 libc-test] functional:time:clock_nanosleep test Szabolcs Nagy writes: > thanks > patches look good. but it will take a week or two > for me to be able to test and apply them. Thank you for the quick response. We appreciate your timeline for testing a= nd applying the patches. Our plan is to submit tests for the majority of functions that currently la= ck coverage within libc-test.=20 We already have a significant number of tests written and ready for submiss= ion. To avoid overwhelming you with patches, do you have a preferred cadence for the submission of the= se tests? Additionally, we are planning to setup runtime tests in collaboration with = the Buildroot community. This would facilitate testing across various embedded configurations and process= or architectures. Once up=20 and running, when we submit new test patches we can reference a fork of Bui= ldroot that shows the tests=20 passing on various hardware configurations. Looking forward to your guidance, Ryan Gardner