From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,
	RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Received: (qmail 4640 invoked from network); 18 Apr 2023 15:48:42 -0000
Received: from second.openwall.net (193.110.157.125)
  by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 18 Apr 2023 15:48:42 -0000
Received: (qmail 31898 invoked by uid 550); 18 Apr 2023 15:48:39 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-ID: <musl.lists.openwall.com>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Received: (qmail 31862 invoked from network); 18 Apr 2023 15:48:38 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1681832906; x=1684424906;
        h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:to
         :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id
         :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
        bh=98esmG8105IbHH2rXdam/jDpf4eNExVKFtMpmKbjMRE=;
        b=Cc8GJZnnFDGn7682W9ksdWWsvvcu4n+L6Idu8+19Mn+v3APN8IE5PKbgtrulOwrC0K
         um8pdv+t1t65g/wareiTugS4H929+r6AGVpI/7/BoEAJC1YGveXQs2kz/ALsI/XRS+Gm
         ILwKQ3xVXXX6qozOKMaT/sMOci74h7BOm+bNG9229O43+PpB/xAzaniiQbws2XzA8n4A
         OqzGccjA0PVOA3rAgAVKbgxW7B+ru0LC85tXSJy2+fAs2q0UooQhCKwEd4bqivmmISyK
         oEshLpAPQeB+P6n6+7aZzNSiHUie7wNlzlg+gSogHT+hUse5BHX+z/ZxO8Z0XfBTsYpk
         Mtkw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1681832906; x=1684424906;
        h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:to
         :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id
         :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
        bh=98esmG8105IbHH2rXdam/jDpf4eNExVKFtMpmKbjMRE=;
        b=ivP/+ESe/4JnqBmkSyaQGa1tYSb/xqyOvGltVf++0C6vGudjZ9sNFJ7ZWGM2jycSCG
         FXjzBQgcakPpmH8P4zLyXaUoEGFN+JnzxFAq/iukKhQzm9NZDmShaectPXqdx7SfRGDB
         y1R6U50+gxysu/txp2iUgrUzOJLwV2U7BkNIXSkkpCf+dvisWW6DzFRFkg+LRKMe+Qhr
         xKKkMJ0iWa5xoyQs1Gm5gUa6J9kT95DdNu4L7rRx33T8z7f/BEkv6C596pj7VVKE6rFH
         toS/Q+7lWSMnJzowHI+xi0GKwzoBbbp1CR5CwAGkXNtrY59+OeOpk96gxyCRGWduzgZN
         lmnA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9eSrq2DjTl2C/eyOYvj/UKHQd5GcQ/pyFTQPOlmIjBB/x0y5BXf
	YmVG31TkrWUrfow8mV+NLPAkGo8T3kv0cg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350Y5+oMGljIgBo6Mm5Kbe6/S2UGfg8QcxoMy3xQqeoHigYJQMXZf+TEcEJSfc/J9lgyuPpjMXg==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:70c5:b0:94e:4285:390c with SMTP id g5-20020a17090670c500b0094e4285390cmr10024743ejk.10.1681832906497;
        Tue, 18 Apr 2023 08:48:26 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <943e77cc-4776-9ae2-a984-84b95f2a24d0@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2023 17:48:25 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.9.1
Content-Language: en-US
To: musl@lists.openwall.com, Bruno Haible <bruno@clisp.org>
References: <5129919.jY9Djz4Zq0@nimes> <14500940.mzqWEpnEhh@nimes>
From: Gabriel Ravier <gabravier@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <14500940.mzqWEpnEhh@nimes>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [musl] Re: wmemcmp and wcscmp returns incorrect results for some
 inputs, on most architectures

On 4/18/23 17:40, Bruno Haible wrote:
> PS: I see that for wcscmp a correction has been added on 2023-01-04.
>      The bug still exists in wmemcmp.
>
>
>
Yup, I forgot about wmemcmp after finding the bug in wcscmp and wcsncmp 
(also, you might want to start testing wcsncmp if you're testing this 
across various C libraries).