From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: from second.openwall.net (second.openwall.net [193.110.157.125]) by inbox.vuxu.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8B69C26A1C for ; Mon, 5 Aug 2024 14:56:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 3853 invoked by uid 550); 5 Aug 2024 12:56:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com Received: (qmail 17420 invoked from network); 5 Aug 2024 12:22:43 -0000 X-ENS-nef-client: 129.199.129.49 ( name = mail.eleves.ens.fr ) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ens.psl.eu; s=default; t=1722860554; bh=cwbkk/7X6O1TcUs4V4AqW6BmRZ80NuTC0kvg8SmZVOE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:From; b=V9sgaiQM1wHD00XUgcA1kYDgBjksB7GIHM15jR0zuW7vuhomGK+Tn6Mdt0ajQ6Yvf Qgf3Tys7e3F8+Nhr1SIB9pIJF8CNkTedqGVPxuCZvwmzbEsWUYkaulJx9/5Iz9d/xi aT/yBx60GsHCNi7rcKnlkmKnCT7BsjQ67wHbKI7QmFMjcs0mbGr5DVmcTbPoOndj/x tCgli7SX0oNDuR7fhqGS51SI/rRo3+ssJlMI3B3ba3skLgEh07QdcghOrppZEcJwah /I90oWyvIxEYXrUZONDH1Lw7a5YpeIR52WYlklXi3GkirAywwWGV2J8YGP9Pm/smeM 5ON/5lIvju5dg== X-Envelope-To: Paul.Zimmermann@inria.fr MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2024 14:22:34 +0200 From: Selene Corbineau To: musl@lists.openwall.com Cc: Paul Zimmermann Message-ID: <9ea8df217179a1c6c7bc0bd0d7001721@ens.psl.eu> X-Sender: selene.corbineau@ens.psl.eu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (nef.ens.fr [129.199.96.32]); Mon, 05 Aug 2024 14:22:34 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [musl] Obsolete comment in powl, and (s)NaN handling ? Hello, Currently, src/math/powl.c line 66 states that powl(x, y) returns 0 when x < 0 and y not an integer. However, lines 290-291 > if (iyflg == 0) > return (x - x) / (x - x); /* (x<0)**(non-int) is NaN */ precisely ensure this is not the case. Both these excerpts come from the original commit. Maybe line 66 should be deleted/corrected ? Deviating a bit, are there plans for supporting signalling NaNs in Musl ? Thanks in advance, Sélène