From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/248
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: <nicolas@atelier-web.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: BusyBox =?UTF-8?Q?=3F?=
Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2011 19:41:22 +0200
Message-ID: <9f8fcd37dea8cd3fe5ce425947229ced@smtp1.ispfr.net>
References: <b0f63a713975829378467e36d440f837@smtp1.ispfr.net>
 <CAK8RtFqR1yeZQ5Jie5fUvSehCwLOfVT6Z1D+d7+xXd=p0hs_YA@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1312566103 16930 80.91.229.12 (5 Aug 2011 17:41:43 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2011 17:41:43 +0000 (UTC)
To: <musl@lists.openwall.com>
Original-X-From: musl-return-332-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Fri Aug 05 19:41:39 2011
Return-path: <musl-return-332-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@lo.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by lo.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-332-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1QpOOt-0002vO-SQ
	for gllmg-musl@lo.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Aug 2011 19:41:36 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 12165 invoked by uid 550); 5 Aug 2011 17:41:35 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 12157 invoked from network); 5 Aug 2011 17:41:34 -0000
In-Reply-To: <CAK8RtFqR1yeZQ5Jie5fUvSehCwLOfVT6Z1D+d7+xXd=p0hs_YA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Sender: nicolas@atelier-web.com
User-Agent: RoundCube Webmail/0.4-beta
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:248
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/248>

Thanks !

Is this patch always necessary ?
https://github.com/chneukirchen/sabotage/blob/master/KEEP/busybox.patch
If yes, should we contact the BusyBox project to say them to add the : #if
defined(__musl__) ?

I have to test that...
I'll keep you informed.

Cheers,
Nick

On Thu, 4 Aug 2011 15:18:26 +0200, Jens Staal <staal1978@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi
> 
> I made an AUR for BusyBox built statically against musl and did not
> experience any problems back then.
> 
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50309
> 
> check out the config attached to that build. It might give an
> indication if the things you want are possible to build.
>