> On 29 May 2015, at 19:03, Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> wrote:
> 
> This logic looks wrong. For example, "-L foo" would result in input=1,
> no? And same for any other options with arguments.
> 
> Rich

Hmm, I’m afraid you’re right. I’ll need to rethink this approach...
I was slightly annoyed by it being needed in the first place, but there’s no
other way from what I could see than these markers to figure out what comes
from a user and what doesn’t, since clang re-orders -l and -L arguments.
If they weren’t needed I could just move -lc to the linker wrapper...

-S