From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,
	RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Received: (qmail 17778 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2020 17:38:49 -0000
Received: from mother.openwall.net (195.42.179.200)
  by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 26 Oct 2020 17:38:49 -0000
Received: (qmail 11485 invoked by uid 550); 26 Oct 2020 17:38:46 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-ID: <musl.lists.openwall.com>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Received: (qmail 11449 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2020 17:38:46 -0000
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at disroot.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail;
	t=1603733910; bh=BIXtcTID82Wi8grpS057kKnTCvMuWD5j80KGeqPlJOI=;
	h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To;
	b=bXc52KgbEKs/bjYB6ud04kdJwdb5aWylP0o0oL2/p1xzTc8pMEDOvLecoSVUg6XD1
	 ammWYn8CcpLC4ag2g5aCh3ovaxRIPxuES6wu3+5DRS7I90TygwKto/W6posKRu1ktQ
	 ydjYU4Q8NNHTGElHEAi8J4f6wnlm3S9aadN/mSLaFyh00oFDvwil2FdcHwExGq93Kf
	 TAGkusyf+1VP/VD1lRMk/UgWWnDm3qk10fxKKpoGV3EyvvYJB1SW6wA9GKGaW7MUDZ
	 KCz7SFKI2NfdO7S5hPXQ2EUtKTJbwRFj3BRpZwJ8XUQiqpmfp+KhVxo4BALdPuYZmt
	 wczbhv9uNYzsA==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
From: =?utf-8?q?=C3=89rico_Nogueira?= <ericonr@disroot.org>
To: "Mark Wielaard" <mark@klomp.org>, <elfutils-devel@sourceware.org>,
 <musl@lists.openwall.com>
Cc: =?utf-8?q?=C3=89rico_Rolim?= <erico.erc@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 14:28:59 -0300
Message-Id: <C6N00TCRSZ1Q.2N2OVNTROUQHZ@mussels>
In-Reply-To: <723b967389be88475206c5afc280c3be02ab677c.camel@klomp.org>
Subject: [musl] Re: [QUESTION] Which fnmatch() functionality does elfutils depend
 on?

On Mon Oct 26, 2020 at 3:10 PM -03, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hi =C3=89rico,
>
> On Mon, 2020-10-26 at 12:03 -0300, =C3=89rico Nogueira via Elfutils-devel
> wrote:
> > Do elfutils program actually depend on the extra functionality
> > enabled by
> > FNM_EXTMATCH? Is changing the flag to have no effect a "bug"?
>
> Yes. The extended wildcard pattern is relied upon by both
> eu-strip with
>
> --keep-section=3DSECTION Keep the named section. SECTION is an
> extended wildcard pattern. May be given
> more than once.
>
> and eu-elfcompress with
>
> -n, --name=3DSECTION SECTION name to (de)compress, SECTION is an
> extended wildcard pattern (defaults to
> '.?(z)debug*')
>
> In the eu-strip case it might be reasoned that instead of a
> wildcard pattern the user might most of the time simply provide
> a section name as is (especially since the option may be given
> multiple times). But in the case of eu-elfcompress the
> program relies on the default SECTION name being an extended
> wildcard pattern. So not supporting FNM_EXTMATCH breaks the
> default functionality of eu-elfcompress.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Mark

Understood, thank you. I'm replying to the musl mailing list as well,
then, to hopefully gather more opinions, since I don't know what the
best way of solving this would be.

Thanks,
=C3=89rico